Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Used RX-8 and G35 Coupe?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-08-2008, 02:00 PM
  #21  
Registered User

 
sahtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

G isn't really very sporty IMO. The suspension is pretty soft and it weighs almost two tons.

The RX-8 is underrated. It handles very well, it's right on par with the 350z and s2000, superior to the G35 without question.

Just make sure either one is owned by an adult who didn't abuse it. More of a problem with the 8 but still an issue with older G's.

The G has more power but performance wise they are about the same. I'd take a 200hp 2000lbs car over a 400hp 4000lbs car any day FWIW.
Old 04-08-2008, 02:14 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
erliuic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Apr 8 2008, 01:47 PM
Wait, there's a car thats not designed to consume fuel? Like an electrioc car? What's your point?
My point was to not freak out when you have to add oil as often as every other fill up. No big deal but definitely consumes more oil than the average car.
Old 04-08-2008, 02:18 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
erliuic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=sahtt,Apr 8 2008, 02:00 PM] G isn't really very sporty IMO.
Old 04-08-2008, 02:30 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
erliuic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Apr 8 2008, 01:46 PM
0-60 on an RX-8 is under 6 seconds - hardly what I'd call slow. The RX-9 is the lighter car, and its driving characteristic reflects that - its like a four-door S2000. The G35 is a GT car - heavier, with a bigger engine and more torque, and it will drive with more weighted feel.

They are both good cars, but the G will get better gas mileage, and the RX-8 is only worth money if its a manual. You'll have to drive them both and make up your mind. You can find good RX-8s all day at 16-17k.
Saki, the Accord does 0-60 in 6.3 and the 335i is under 5. Under six seconds was super car territory 20 years ago but alas side burns and plenty of mousse is no longer in fashion. Many expect speed and sharp handling to be the epitome of what a sports car is. Don't get me wrong the 8 is a great car in its own right but I just didn't want his brother to get disappointed at the stoplight if he was expecting otherwise.
Old 04-08-2008, 02:33 PM
  #25  
Registered User

 
Mystiqueskillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

G35 all the way.
Old 04-08-2008, 03:33 PM
  #26  
Registered User

 
Vik2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Behind You
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

G35, but of course much more expensive.
Old 04-08-2008, 09:41 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Jacques79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know you want 2000 and newer but pleaaaaaassssseeeee check out a 1999 BMW M3.

Faster than the RX-8, handles better than the G35, backseats are very decent, and you can find a clean one for 18K.

It's ''only'' 240HP but the engine feels much stronger than the G35 or RX-8's

Seriously just test drive a manual clean STOCK 1999 M3 and then drive the 2 other cars.
Old 04-08-2008, 09:52 PM
  #28  
Moderator
Moderator
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,993
Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by erliuic,Apr 8 2008, 06:30 PM
Saki, the Accord does 0-60 in 6.3 and the 335i is under 5. Under six seconds was super car territory 20 years ago but alas side burns and plenty of mousse is no longer in fashion. Many expect speed and sharp handling to be the epitome of what a sports car is. Don't get me wrong the 8 is a great car in its own right but I just didn't want his brother to get disappointed at the stoplight if he was expecting otherwise.
I hear ya, but remember the S isn't exactly lighting the world on fire with 0-60 times either. My general point is, anyhing under 6 s to 60 is fast. My main issue is with people who call an RX-8 slow - its not.

To the OP - where is your brother looking, anyway? That may effect your choice as well.
Old 04-08-2008, 09:56 PM
  #29  
Moderator
Moderator
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,993
Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jacques79,Apr 9 2008, 01:41 AM
I know you want 2000 and newer but pleaaaaaassssseeeee check out a 1999 BMW M3.

Faster than the RX-8, handles better than the G35, backseats are very decent, and you can find a clean one for 18K.

It's ''only'' 240HP but the engine feels much stronger than the G35 or RX-8's

Seriously just test drive a manual clean STOCK 1999 M3 and then drive the 2 other cars.
Actually, that M3 has about the same weight as the RX, and the RX has about the same hp. The differences include the torque of the bimmer engine, and age.

That is a great BMW though.
Old 04-08-2008, 10:15 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Jacques79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Saki GT,Apr 8 2008, 09:56 PM] Actually, that M3 has about the same weight as the RX, and the RX has about the same hp.


Quick Reply: Used RX-8 and G35 Coupe?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:11 PM.