Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

TSX is here!

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-07-2003, 04:36 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
PlasticTHUG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Durham
Posts: 2,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by JonBoy
[B]...I just love how there are so many comments that bash it, yet none of you has driven it.
Old 04-07-2003, 06:11 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
REDGSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northern
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, its not a 32k car...
From the acura website...

TSX 6 speed 26,490
w/nav 28.490

TL Type S 31,330
w/nav 33,480

Infiniti G35 30,195
w/ nav, sunroof, and 17" rims (although im not sure this combo is even possible, it seems you have to add the premium also)
33,620

So either the TL or G35 are about $5k more for a comparibly equipped car with an extra 60 hp. Only if you add ALL the accesories do you get close to 32k for the TSX. But then it wouldn't be a direct comparison...

BTW, the car is gorgeous, better in person as most honda's are (s2000 included)
Old 04-07-2003, 06:57 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
StrangeDaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the TSX looks good in most of the pics I've seen. I have seen a bad angle or two, but I am hoping the car will look good in person. The new Accord is a stinker. That coupled with the fact that you can only get the 6 speed in the Accord coupe means I just might have to replace my Accord sedan 4 banger/5 speed with a TSX. That would rock!

I don't see the TSX as being a direct competitor to the TL Type S and I don't think Acura does either.
Old 04-07-2003, 08:01 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
shyong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by JonBoy
[B]...I just love how there are so many comments that bash it, yet none of you has driven it.
Old 04-07-2003, 08:10 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
otep12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a known fact that Honda marks up their new cars while they're hot. Let's all wait a few months and do the $-HP comparo then.

Hell, Mitsu is selling the Evo for 100% over sticker so maybe that's the reason you don't see any on the roads.
Old 04-07-2003, 08:20 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
shyong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

otep12,

I agree. Everyone should wait a bit before buying a car now. 6 months should be sufficient. The EVO can be had for invoice by 6 months. And I'm sure Acura would be more willing to deal with you by then as well. And if anyones' in the market for an STI there's quite a few dealerships selling them for MSRP ($31K-$32K). I wouldn't buy into the whole 'new' hype. Let all the other idiots pay MSRP or more for cars that'll flood the market within 2 years.
Old 04-07-2003, 08:47 AM
  #37  

 
clutchcargo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 881
Received 92 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

I agree with the pricing problem.

A TL without the NAV is under $29K.

A couple of questions.

Isn't this just a 4 door RSX with the 200HP type S motor?

I believe the past car, the Integra was built on the Civic platform.

Is the current car built on the Accord platform?
Old 04-07-2003, 09:01 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
stocks2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lewisville
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Friday I went and drove an EVO and then immediately drove the TSX. The Mitsu dealer and Acura dealer are next to each other. I would NEVER spend 32-25K for an EVO after driving it.

I was impressed with the TSX, but I felt it was a little underpowered. It does not have the RSX Type S engine. It is the 2.4 from the Accord and CRV reworked for 200 hp. It has a lot smoother and broader torque curve than the RSX. The TSX I would want is 29K. Not bad I don't think.

I don't know what Lexus dealers you all go to, but the ones around here would want 35K+ for a comparably equipped IS300 and it still has those horrible tail lights.

The Accord Coupe I am looking at is 28,800 so I am just torn between the power of the V6 coupe or the extra warranty and HID lights on the TSX.
Old 04-07-2003, 10:57 AM
  #39  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by shyong
[B]


Last I noticed...you didn't have to test drive a car to express your opinion of how ugly the car was.
Old 04-07-2003, 11:37 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
bjohnston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern Part of Heaven
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the TSX is a great car, based on what I've read, and I probably would have bought one if it had been out in December. The prices that have been noted above are way off what you should actually expect to pay. The 6-spd w/out nav should go out the door for something around $24K (that's about what invoice is, I believe). Add $1,700 or so for the nav. That's a TON of car for $24K. I think it offers a nice alternative to the V6 EX Accord, and it undercuts the 1.8T, 325i, 9-3, G35, and IS300 by a lot of $ at $24K. At that price you get leather, heated seats, real wood trim, great sound system, 8 airbags, ABS, 17" wheels, Xenons, etc. I think you'd be hard-pressed to find more new car for the $. Yes, the WRX will offer more performance, but the TSX offers much higher quality and more features for similar money. For the smart shopper, I think it is a hell of a buy for around $24K.


Quick Reply: TSX is here!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 AM.