Trident Iceni
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USSA
Posts: 10,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2
Community Organizer
OM* that's fugly. Like some Solstice abomination.
#4
Very expensive and I am a little skeptical about the performance claims but I think it looks ok. I think the wild dual performance claim is to get lots of free publicity.
Kind of looks like it will fold up in a crash. I don't know how you could tell that from looking at it but it gives me that feeling.
Kind of looks like it will fold up in a crash. I don't know how you could tell that from looking at it but it gives me that feeling.
#7
Registered User
Further, through the use of torque multiplication, the company is claiming that the car has achieved 68.9 miles-per-gallon at a steady 70 mph during a test at the Millbrook Proving Ground.
I had a 1984 Nissan Sentra w/ a diesel engine. On a level road, it could maintain 35mph in 4th gear with no throttle application. If I had done a long-range test, it was probably getting about 60mpg or more (since it usually averaged 40mpg with normal mixed driving).
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vader1,Aug 20 2008, 07:04 AM
Very expensive and I am a little skeptical about the performance claims but I think it looks ok. I think the wild dual performance claim is to get lots of free publicity.
Kind of looks like it will fold up in a crash. I don't know how you could tell that from looking at it but it gives me that feeling.
Kind of looks like it will fold up in a crash. I don't know how you could tell that from looking at it but it gives me that feeling.
#10
Former Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ventura, California, USA
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by mxt_77,Aug 20 2008, 08:44 AM
BTW... anybody look at the interior pic? The dash portion of the center console looks like a ghost's face. That would creep me out.