TL Type-S For 2007
#12
Registered User
Originally Posted by umop-apisdn,Aug 6 2006, 02:37 PM
I want to see the current TL in a two door config.
#16
Originally Posted by VTEC_Junkie,Aug 6 2006, 05:10 PM
acura doesn't need a TL-S. they need to drop the price of their way overpriced RL by $9K.
The car is definitely not overpriced. For the content, it's cheaper than ANY of the competition. The only reason to say it's overpriced is because "it's just an Acura"...
#17
Originally Posted by dmz,Aug 6 2006, 11:59 PM
The TL does not need more power, It needs RWD!
The Standard TL 6 speed already has enough torque steer. It can only get worst with more power.
The Standard TL 6 speed already has enough torque steer. It can only get worst with more power.
That picture above is terrible imo. Hope it looks better on the hoof. Were they get "sinister" from that is beyond me. Don't think they are creating any fear in their RWD competitors
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vAnt,Aug 7 2006, 06:58 AM
It doesn't look as 'sinister' as I thought it would. I was thinking of something more aggressive then the TSX-V. This is even more bland then the base TSX!
What's a TSX-V?
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dana Point, CA
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go ahead and hang me but... I'm not impressed.
The current TL is a great value but it's already putting too much power through the front wheels and it's got horrible torque steer as it is.
If you're going to get serious Honda... and I hope you are... do it right and give us, the enthusiats, a RWD sedan that is actually fun to drive and not just great on paper.
The current TL is a great value but it's already putting too much power through the front wheels and it's got horrible torque steer as it is.
If you're going to get serious Honda... and I hope you are... do it right and give us, the enthusiats, a RWD sedan that is actually fun to drive and not just great on paper.