S2KI Honda S2000 Forums

Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Supra TT or NSX?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-25-2008, 08:09 AM
  #31  
Registered User

 
Boost76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
I like the NA1 & I'm thinking about getting one myself. Supras are cool too but I don't want a money pit.
Boost76 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 08:37 AM
  #32  
Registered User

 
Vik2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Behind You
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default
nsx of course...
Vik2000 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 09:24 AM
  #33  

 
bahula03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 28,136
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by craig2teg,Feb 24 2008, 04:08 PM
NSX FTW
bahula03 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 10:03 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Jacques79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
NSX without a doubt.

Spring an extra 5k for a 1997, it's worth it.
Jacques79 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 10:22 AM
  #35  

 
MoogieBoogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 302
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by Jacques79,Feb 25 2008, 02:03 PM
NSX without a doubt.

Spring an extra 5k for a 1997, it's worth it.
If you want the targa, then get the 97 over the 95-96. The 95-96 are considered the slowest due to the weight of being a targa and still having the c30. If you want a coupe, you'll have a hell of time finding one 95+. And when you do find one, they usually go for a slight premium due to their rarity.
MoogieBoogie is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 12:11 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
ionlylive's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Saint Joseph's University
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
wow, ok..after seeing those videos NSX hands down
ionlylive is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 01:35 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
Quivers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
NSX, megasex!
Quivers is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 02:20 PM
  #38  

 
omgitsoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Ive been looking at the same two cars for a while now, but i see a few older nsx's here and there, but i almost never see a decent supra for sale, and damn the resale value on those. id say nsx personally, with an n/a package from www.scienceofspeed.com
omgitsoop is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 04:54 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
natedawg500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kankakee, IL
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
3.2L nsx > supra > 3.0L nsx

If that makes any sense. Thats how I feel about them.

So in your case I'd get a supra.
natedawg500 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 02-25-2008, 05:43 PM
  #40  
Registered User

 
Meeyatch1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: In a glass case of emotion!
Posts: 7,251
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by ChuckV,Feb 24 2008, 10:01 PM
I'd be weary of a sports car with that many miles that isn't in 100% immaculate condition. Even then...
Where are you getting this from? I am sorry...but you are off base on this one. I would not be the least bit afraid of buying an NSX with 75,000 miles on it as long as it has been maintained. Piddly stuff like an oil pan gasket is a cheap and easy fix. If you buy the car right and even put $1,000 into it, and have a perfect car then, who cares? The thing will last 200,000 to 300,000 miles at least if well maintained and not beaten.
Meeyatch1 is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Supra TT or NSX?


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 PM.