Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Sports car market too niche for fuel saving tech?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-06-2008 | 09:47 PM
  #11  
Vik2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 4
From: Behind You
Default

i know this is off-topic but when I saw the weight on the sticker underneath the door, it said about 3300lbs for s2000. What weight is that...? I thought s2k weighs 2800~2900.
Old 08-07-2008 | 05:15 AM
  #12  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

That's the GVWR (gross vehicle weight rating) and it's the MAXIMUM weight the car, as a whole unit, can carry - it includes the car itself, the driver and passenger, luggage, hardtop, and everything else in the car.

It basically means that you can only carry an extra 400 lbs in your S. So if you and your friend both weight 200 lbs, better leave that soda behind because you'd be over loading the car otherwise.
Old 08-07-2008 | 10:02 AM
  #13  
Jimmies's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Aug 6 2008, 01:51 PM
Personally, I'd *love* to see the emphasis for "sports cars" turned back to small size, minimalism and LIGHT WEIGHT as opposed to the trend toward ever-more-ridiculously-powerful super-ultra-mega-ubercars. That would create more real-world FUN cars that also get much better mpg.
Right on. Lighter cars need significantly less power to boogie, and every single performance aspect is improved with less weight.
Old 08-07-2008 | 10:10 AM
  #14  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,857
Likes: 438
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

True but the collective "we" need to quit filling out satisfaction surveys that say:


Need to improve: Would like heated seats, and nav, and 20 inch wheels, and climate control, and a subwoofer, blah blah blah.


How about on the survey say "Make it lighter and simpler."
Old 08-07-2008 | 10:42 AM
  #15  
Voodoo_S2K's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,792
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Well isn't VTEC, Honda's method to have good fuel economy without sacrificing performance.
Old 08-07-2008 | 02:47 PM
  #16  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

I thought VTEC was to overcome the power limitations of a single cam profile over a wide RPM range, not really for mileage? I read a good argument that their VTEC system for VFR motorcycles (2 valves going to 4) was to help pass noise limits in Japan more than anything else.

Porsches are getting DFI systems. But since DFI improves both power AND mileage do you consider that "fuel saving?"
Old 08-07-2008 | 09:44 PM
  #17  
Vik2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 4
From: Behind You
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Aug 7 2008, 05:15 AM
That's the GVWR (gross vehicle weight rating) and it's the MAXIMUM weight the car, as a whole unit, can carry - it includes the car itself, the driver and passenger, luggage, hardtop, and everything else in the car.

It basically means that you can only carry an extra 400 lbs in your S. So if you and your friend both weight 200 lbs, better leave that soda behind because you'd be over loading the car otherwise.
Thanks for clarifying!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2007 Zx-10
Car and Bike Talk
63
05-28-2009 11:24 AM
gaddafi
Car Talk - Non S2000
19
04-07-2008 02:32 PM
PariS2K
S2000 Talk
14
06-06-2001 01:38 PM



Quick Reply: Sports car market too niche for fuel saving tech?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:23 AM.