Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Sport Compact Car Article... EVO vs. 911 C4S, M3, & S4.........

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-23-2003, 11:57 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Glendale
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 00S2K01S4
[B]The S4 was also experiencing the hot weather right?
Old 07-23-2003, 04:33 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
TwiBlueG35's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bell
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Where are the STI and 350Z? By the way, 5.9 seconds from 0 to 60 for Evo? That's kind of slow.
Old 07-23-2003, 06:36 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
MDXLuvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N. Tx.
Posts: 4,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 00S2K01S4
[B]The S4 was also experiencing the hot weather right?
Old 07-23-2003, 07:41 PM
  #14  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by vroom
It would be cool sometime to see car tests like they do SportBike tests where they slap on the same rubber to equalize the variables.
Completely agree. I hope they at least monitor tire pressures and keep them constant -- tire pressures alone could make a difference of a second or more over a course of this length. Since there's less than two seconds between the three fastest cars, their results are rather questionable if they didn't.

Originally posted by TwiBlueG35
Where are the STI and 350Z? By the way, 5.9 seconds from 0 to 60 for Evo? That's kind of slow.
Uh... maybe you should read the thread again.

Steve
Old 07-23-2003, 07:55 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
integrate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Irvine
Posts: 8,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Were they running clockwise or counter clockwise at SOW?
Old 07-23-2003, 10:57 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
stekson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Short Hills
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

still haven't got this issue

-stek
Old 07-24-2003, 12:20 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Glendale
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by integrate
Were they running clockwise or counter clockwise at SOW?
Didn't say in the article.
Old 07-24-2003, 09:09 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
DavidM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also the C4S is pretty much faster than the C2 in most track conditions, with a skilled driver. It is a little bit slower on the straights but with bigger, stronger brakes, and better chassis dynamics it has lapped most tracks faster than even the C2 w/sports suspension.

Hi Fanman, I was not aware of that ... just the 996 C2 and C4 relation (which goes in favour of the C2). Have you got any more info about the C4S vs C2? Any actual lap-times (from magazines)?

ps. I don't see how a clutch has much to do with the 5-60mph time. The clutch is fully engaged before they floor the car and hence tghere's no slip ... if there was then in particluar the lap time would sugger. The only time the clutch should have been involved in the 5-60mph exercise is when changin from 2nd to 3rd and the slip there is not going to make too much difference there (as it would be then reflected in the 0-60mph time which can have the clutch slip on the 'launch' and the 1st-to-2nd change).
Old 07-24-2003, 09:21 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
wantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: La La Land
Posts: 29,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I can't believe the M3 performed that well against the competition...
Old 07-24-2003, 09:52 PM
  #20  

 
00S2K01S4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,463
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by MDXLuvr
[B]

the new s4 is not turbocharged, it has v8 instead.


Quick Reply: Sport Compact Car Article... EVO vs. 911 C4S, M3, & S4.........



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 PM.