Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Should I get an ILX or an ATS

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-12-2016, 06:45 PM
  #21  
Registered User

 
rob-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,657
Received 170 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Ilx yikes!
Old 04-12-2016, 08:48 PM
  #22  

Thread Starter
 
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Received 118 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

BUT DAT RALIYABILIDY DOH.
Old 04-12-2016, 09:28 PM
  #23  

 
EricJT7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Domestic cars are becoming more and more reliable. Though I'd stay away from the turbocharged four in the ATS, with the (better) six cylinder option. If going four-banger, the ILX, Accord, or Mazda 3. Too bad they didn't just continue the TSX instead of the ILX/TLX nonsense, it was a much better looking car.
Old 04-13-2016, 04:00 AM
  #24  

 
Conedodger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 13,468
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EricJT7
Too bad they didn't just continue the TSX instead of the ILX/TLX nonsense, it was a much better looking car.


My wife has a 2005 TSX that we love! It is getting old, the rust is settling in, and the miles are climbing, so we've started looking for a replacement. Would another TSX in a heartbeat if we could.
Old 04-13-2016, 04:56 AM
  #25  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,431
Received 281 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

I mean between the two options you've listed, I vote ATS all the way.
Old 04-13-2016, 08:40 AM
  #26  
Registered User

 
Marioshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,094
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EricJT7
New Mazda 3 GT sedan with the (bigger) 2.5 liter 4 cylinder. Good interior, fuel efficient, okay looks.
For some reason this came to my mind as well. A fully loaded Mazda 3 or 6. I dunno why, except that they are super nice inside, good looking, and fun to drive (but slow). I don't see the point of having an ATS and a Corvette, seems like overlap. I can't get onboard with the ILX, sorry. A nice Mazda is like a nice Subaru or a Nice Volvo, respectable but not showy.
Old 04-13-2016, 08:42 AM
  #27  

 
MBHs2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Santa Clartia, Ca
Posts: 5,875
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I personally like the redesign of the ILX, they added the jewel headlights and some other cosmetic stuff.
Old 04-13-2016, 06:34 PM
  #28  

Thread Starter
 
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Received 118 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Well, I drove an ILX today and it was pretty disappointing. I could live with it as a daily driver, but It felt completely torqueless. I also drove a TLX 6 cylinder. The V6 is way punchier (obviously), but that is a very numb car. My ex girlfriend had a mid 2000s TL, and that car was great.

Despite the fact that the ILX felt slower than I was expecting (the shifts were very fast, but it felt like it took ten minutes before the car would downshift, which doesn't bode well for passing), I liked the way it drove. It felt equally as sporty as my EP3 Si. The stereo kind of sucked, but it handled reasonably well. I felt like its Civic DNA was actually kind of a plus. It still felt light and connected to the road.

I'm going to drive the Cadillac again soon. I can live with the ILX, but if the Cadillac drives like I remember, it'll be tough to pull me away from it.
Old 04-13-2016, 06:35 PM
  #29  

Thread Starter
 
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Received 118 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MBHs2k
I personally like the redesign of the ILX, they added the jewel headlights and some other cosmetic stuff.

In person, it looked pretty decent. Pics make it look bland, but I thought it had road presence comparable to any other Acura (for what that's worth).
Old 04-13-2016, 07:31 PM
  #30  
Registered User

 
rob-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,657
Received 170 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.E.G.
Well, I drove an ILX today and it was pretty disappointing. I could live with it as a daily driver, but It felt completely torqueless. I also drove a TLX 6 cylinder. The V6 is way punchier (obviously), but that is a very numb car. My ex girlfriend had a mid 2000s TL, and that car was great.

Despite the fact that the ILX felt slower than I was expecting (the shifts were very fast, but it felt like it took ten minutes before the car would downshift, which doesn't bode well for passing), I liked the way it drove. It felt equally as sporty as my EP3 Si. The stereo kind of sucked, but it handled reasonably well. I felt like its Civic DNA was actually kind of a plus. It still felt light and connected to the road.

I'm going to drive the Cadillac again soon. I can live with the ILX, but if the Cadillac drives like I remember, it'll be tough to pull me away from it.
Trust you mean 'couldn't'...


Quick Reply: Should I get an ILX or an ATS



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:22 PM.