Should BMW/Mercedes offer de-contented cars?
#21
Originally Posted by S2020,Nov 9 2009, 10:09 PM
I don't get it.
If you want bare bone cars, there are Lotus, Porsche, Honda, Toyota.
why must one buy Benz and BMW?
If you want bare bone cars, there are Lotus, Porsche, Honda, Toyota.
why must one buy Benz and BMW?
#22
Originally Posted by Saki GT,Nov 9 2009, 09:09 AM
I was talking with a friend who has a three-year old S Class, and he's looking to sell it before the warranty is up. He claims it is in the shop about a week each year he's had it. We got to talking about the car's problems, and it was nothing mechanical, just all the electronic gadgets and other filigree that seems to break, costing him a week of shop time each year.
This is the same story I've gotten from som BMW 7 owners I've talked to, and I've experienced it with my old Audi. The cars have great engines and drive great, but some non-essential system breaks, and you have to take the car in and pay some ridiculous bill.
I don't need four wheel steering, I don't need proximity locks on my rear doors, I don't need a HUD that shows me where pedestrians are at night, etc. I'd love to see a 7 Series or S Class for $10k-$15k less without all this stuff if I just want a nice big car.
What do you think? Rather than buy an $80k 7 Series with stuff you don't really need, would you buy one for $65k-70k that focused on the car and the driving experience? Or, do people expect all these extras on a large car anymore?
This is the same story I've gotten from som BMW 7 owners I've talked to, and I've experienced it with my old Audi. The cars have great engines and drive great, but some non-essential system breaks, and you have to take the car in and pay some ridiculous bill.
I don't need four wheel steering, I don't need proximity locks on my rear doors, I don't need a HUD that shows me where pedestrians are at night, etc. I'd love to see a 7 Series or S Class for $10k-$15k less without all this stuff if I just want a nice big car.
What do you think? Rather than buy an $80k 7 Series with stuff you don't really need, would you buy one for $65k-70k that focused on the car and the driving experience? Or, do people expect all these extras on a large car anymore?
The other half of the eqaution is the stuff that actually effects the driving directly. Go drive a big Benz with and without ABC. Big difference. Unlike much of it, ABC is (was?) an option... as was the air suspension the fails regularly and costs thousands to fix when it first came out. You can't really get rid of this stuff and have the same big awesome German sedan, because the customization of suspension and throttle, the active body control, the 5,000 sampling a second traction control that is also tied into the suspension to give a butter smooth ride that doesn't resemble a barge on the high seas.... all those are integral to the driving experience.
#23
Agreed. I would love an M3 without all the fluff and unobtainium.
#24
Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by R1_Pilot,Nov 9 2009, 09:18 PM
7 days out of 365 if not that bad if you ask me, less than 2% of the time ... I am sure they provide with a loaner car too.
J
J
Its not the amount of tie without the car, its paying so much for a car that is supposed to be a great car to drive, and not being able to listen to music or have it looking ghetto with parts hanging out of it. Mercedes was always the engineered car, so I can see these baubles on an MB, but I wish BMW didn't get as mixed up in that game as well - its really getting hard to buy a pure car from it anymore.
#25
But he probably lost more than $10k in depreciation per year.
That'll cover a lot of repairs.
He's probably going to get another car that will also depreciate $10k per year.
Maybe it's a ploy to keep people buying new cars.
Like that gum commercial where they have to kick his ass to get him to spit out the gum...
If it works too well for too long, who is going to trade it in?
That'll cover a lot of repairs.
He's probably going to get another car that will also depreciate $10k per year.
Maybe it's a ploy to keep people buying new cars.
Like that gum commercial where they have to kick his ass to get him to spit out the gum...
If it works too well for too long, who is going to trade it in?
#26
Site Moderator
You don't buy a 7 series, S class or an A8 for it to be stripped down, I don't see why so many of you can't understand that. They are the flagships of each brand and as such are available with every option possible, you don't have to get all the options, I know my S class doesn't have all the option boxes checked.
I do enjoy my messaging seats though
I do enjoy my messaging seats though
#28
Site Moderator
Originally Posted by sparrow,Nov 10 2009, 10:10 AM
Your seats send emails and txts msgs?
#30
You also have to remember the majority of new BMWs/Mercedes are leased.. They are owned for 2-3-4 years, then traded in for the next 'latest and greatest' - completely destroying their resale value and eventually giving the companies bad names/reps for costly repairs on eventual electrical/gadget failure.
Thats why an 7 series can be had for 50% of MSRP when its two years old. Same with the S class and A8. Now the LS460 on the other hand... not so much - and it can park itself. While the toys might be fun when new, the cars will seem dated very quickly IMO. I still prefer cars like the E38 7 series. The fact I can have a mint 01' with low miles for under 15K... well that doesn't suck either.
Thats why an 7 series can be had for 50% of MSRP when its two years old. Same with the S class and A8. Now the LS460 on the other hand... not so much - and it can park itself. While the toys might be fun when new, the cars will seem dated very quickly IMO. I still prefer cars like the E38 7 series. The fact I can have a mint 01' with low miles for under 15K... well that doesn't suck either.