Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Saturn puts out 1/4 mile estimate for Sky Redline

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-04-2006, 05:40 AM
  #51  

 
Chris Stack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG,May 4 2006, 05:12 AM
You have too much free time on your hands, Stack. Government jobs must be good.
Nah, it sucks, because no one else posts enough to keep up, so I never have enough stuff to read. You guys all need to post more so I have more posts to read while bored at work!


Hopefully, I'll be done with this shit soon, and in the civillian world bustin' my tail. Surfing the net all day gets REALLY boring, trust me.
Old 05-04-2006, 05:55 AM
  #52  

 
Chris Stack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

See? I'm back already, and no one's responded yet. DAMN YOU ALL!!


Old 05-04-2006, 07:35 AM
  #53  
dmz
Registered User
 
dmz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brent_strong,May 3 2006, 07:41 AM
I don't really know where you get that GM does not know how to make a "smooth" 4 cylinder engine. The Ecotec is arguably better than anything Honda is producing right now and is certainly one of the best 4 cylinders on the market.

Now, what would kill the Sky that I saw is the 18" wheels that look like they should be on a rapper's Cadillac. Those things have to weigh a ton! Having 245 tires all around must be nice though. Seemed to be room to fit even more rubber under it too!
You obviously have not driven a Solstice. Think early 90's Nissan 240SX. The motor on the Solstice I drive sounds like a diesel engine from a truck and revs slower than a pushrod engine. If you think that is better than anything Honda is producing right now then I don't know what to say.
Old 05-04-2006, 07:40 AM
  #54  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rockville,May 3 2006, 03:07 PM
JonBoy,
Remember, the SAAB 93 uses an Ecotec motor. It's very smooth. Often the difference between smooth and not smooth is not the motor but how it's mounted and isolated.
I disagree. The Cobalt I drove felt and sounded thrashy, it didn't like to rev, and it sounded rough. Had nothing to do with how it was mounted (it was actually fairly quiet and well damped).

Have you driven a Cobalt yet?
Old 05-04-2006, 07:57 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
S2000spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nj/Nyc
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sky/Sol is on it's way in and S2 is on it's way out.

Best Gm could do with this roadster is a turbo to fight against
an N/A motor? Performance wise its not that much a difference?
Old 05-04-2006, 08:07 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Best Gm could do with this roadster is a turbo to fight against
an N/A motor? Performance wise its not that much a difference?
And yet Honda had to turbo their new RDX -- but it still has less horsepower and gets shittier fuel economy than the cheaper RAV4. Yours is a stupid point always tossed about by the ricers.
Old 05-04-2006, 08:18 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
S2000spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nj/Nyc
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,May 4 2006, 11:07 AM
And yet Honda had to turbo their new RDX -- but it still has less horsepower and gets shittier fuel economy than the cheaper RAV4. Yours is a stupid point always tossed about by the ricers.
Funny..I though this is about comparing the S2 and the Sky/Sol?
It's so like you to go on about something else. What is your point?
I'm asian, rice is in my blood.
Old 05-04-2006, 09:03 AM
  #58  
Registered User
 
Slithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think Steve has a valid point here. You opened the door........
Old 05-04-2006, 09:37 AM
  #59  
Registered User
 
Dr. WOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not necessarily. I think NA is very appropriate for a sports car, while a turbo provides the low end grunt you want in a cross-over SUV. Not that the converse isn't true, but there is valid logic to support Honda's approach.

It is a fact that there are very few (no) direct competitors that chose FI, must be some reason for that. MazdaSpeed Miata is the only one I can think of?
Old 05-04-2006, 09:59 AM
  #60  
Registered User
 
Christople's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Corn Country
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dr. WOT,May 4 2006, 12:37 PM
Not necessarily. I think NA is very appropriate for a sports car, while a turbo provides the low end grunt you want in a cross-over SUV. Not that the converse isn't true, but there is valid logic to support Honda's approach.

It is a fact that there are very few (no) direct competitors that chose FI, must be some reason for that. MazdaSpeed Miata is the only one I can think of?
Or just make a bigger engine that provides tq....

Every auto company approaches differently and each thinks they are right. As a consumer and also going by numbers I choose otherwise


Quick Reply: Saturn puts out 1/4 mile estimate for Sky Redline



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:58 AM.