Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

s2k v. c5 vette

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-12-2006, 11:06 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
nevert00fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=s2kpdx01,Nov 12 2006, 02:19 PM] What mods do you have to your Z?
Old 11-12-2006, 11:27 AM
  #52  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by nevert00fast,Nov 12 2006, 10:59 AM
All those who said the S2K will outhandle a C5/Z06, has obviously never driven one before. The S2K might have a slight edge in auto-x, but on a real road course the 'Vette will be quicker.
Handling is not the same as raw speed. A Cadillac CTS-V will murder a Spec Miata around a road course, but that doesn't mean it handles better.

For the record, C5 Corvettes, even the base ones, are faster than equivalently modified S2000s even in autocross.
Old 11-12-2006, 01:30 PM
  #53  
Registered User

 
feistyS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BayArea to SoCal and back!!
Posts: 6,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by archtop,Nov 12 2006, 10:10 AM
Top off in the Vette is not even close to the comfort level of top down in the s2000.The wind noise in my C6 with the top off just plain sucked and removing it to put it in the trunk was like doing a chinese fire drill especially when it started to rain.
now THAT I'll agree with...

the wind turbulance in the 'vette sucks big ba!!s. At least in the S, you can put the windows up and cut the wind, but not in the 'vette. I'm speaking from the convertible C5 standpoint and I hear the coupe is much worse with the top off And trying to put the top down ('vert) when it starts to rain is just plain stupid. Instead of being wet from the shoulders up, you get wet all over from having to get out

with that said, they are two different cars. American muscle sure does have it's good points but then so does the S.
Old 11-12-2006, 01:33 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
kumainu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd take a new C6, but not C5.
Old 11-12-2006, 02:27 PM
  #55  
Registered User

 
s2kva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have not owned a C5 but think a well taken car of used one would be a great value. It would offer a different feel from the s2k (more punch, smoother ride) which sounds like what you are looking for. But as some have mentioned, if maintenance costs are a consideration, you may spend more on the C5 than you would with the s2k. Alot of reliability surveys seem to indicate that atleast. Here is a recent one from CNN.

http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/autos/reliable/5.html

Buy what suits you. Good luck
Old 11-12-2006, 02:42 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
way2low01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nevert00fast,Nov 12 2006, 10:59 AM
All those who said the S2K will outhandle a C5/Z06, has obviously never driven one before. The S2K might have a slight edge in auto-x, but on a real road course the 'Vette will be quicker.

Here's a pic of mine since everybody's posting theirs.



BTW, my old SC'ed S2K wasn't even close in acceleration compared to the Z even when it was stock.
I used to have so much fun with vettes in my big turbo srt4. Great lookn vet my man!
Old 11-12-2006, 03:21 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
nevert00fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by way2low01,Nov 12 2006, 06:42 PM
I used to have so much fun with vettes in my big turbo srt4. Great lookn vet my man!
Thanks!

I haven't ran into any heavily modded SRT4s yet, mostly modded on the stock turbo. But I know they're little monsters on the highway, I'll probably need to spray to beat the ones with bigger turbos.
Old 11-12-2006, 06:39 PM
  #58  

 
waltk88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,998
Received 81 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

It's tough to say which car handles better. The Z06 has more mechanical grip by virtue of its much greater footprint. It's also a bit more forgiving at the limit, which should allow the average driver to push harder. The S2000 feels more tossable due to its smaller size and excellent turn-in response. I'll just say the two cars handle differently. A debate over which handles better will be a discussion of semantics.
Old 11-12-2006, 06:41 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
Superfly05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had an 01 Z06 as well before my S. The car does get looks, it is very fast, and is fun to drive. However, I never though that the S would be more fun to drive as I have found out that it is. Granted it does not have the power of the Z06. I was so tired though of seeing men in their 50's driving it, guys with tons of chains and shirtless, or older women puffing on a cigarette that look oh so nasty. The vette definitely attracks a diffrent class of drivers. No doubt, keep your eyes pealed when you see one and you will understand what I am saying. My next route will be the new M3 or maybe a used 911. All in all though, the vette is the best overall sports car for the money hands down.
Old 11-13-2006, 02:21 PM
  #60  
Registered User
 
ScottB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Aerodax,Nov 8 2006, 11:55 AM] Don't listen to the people here give their opinions on a car they've never driven, especially the comments regarding reliability. Vette's are very reliable; check consumer


Quick Reply: s2k v. c5 vette



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 AM.