S2000 vs. STI
#22
Originally Posted by harshfury,Apr 4 2006, 10:51 AM
No need to think about it anymore....Subaru and Honda have teamed up to release the 2007 WRX S2Kti
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oxnard
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
having owned both, its like comparing apples to oranges.
s2k- will out run the sti in the canyons anyday; better gearbox and tranny; definitely put together alot better. (sti's interior and suspension develops noises over time); rpm's go forever; convertible and definitely a true roadster.
sti- AWD, handful of torque (gotta love that turbo); more room; brembos; stock bbs's; sh$t, thats all i could really think of.. Oh yah, the parts are ALOT easier to obtain, no 3 month wait which is a big plus!!
insurance was actually cheaper w/the s2k being that the sti holds its value more, thus the insurance would have to put up more money if anything were to happen. The sti does eat up gas like a biznitch, but thats only if your a torque hore. Overall, 2 totally different vehicles, I myself would've kept the s2k but w/a baby on the way i unfortunately wasn't able to throw a car seat in the 2 seater.
s2k- will out run the sti in the canyons anyday; better gearbox and tranny; definitely put together alot better. (sti's interior and suspension develops noises over time); rpm's go forever; convertible and definitely a true roadster.
sti- AWD, handful of torque (gotta love that turbo); more room; brembos; stock bbs's; sh$t, thats all i could really think of.. Oh yah, the parts are ALOT easier to obtain, no 3 month wait which is a big plus!!
insurance was actually cheaper w/the s2k being that the sti holds its value more, thus the insurance would have to put up more money if anything were to happen. The sti does eat up gas like a biznitch, but thats only if your a torque hore. Overall, 2 totally different vehicles, I myself would've kept the s2k but w/a baby on the way i unfortunately wasn't able to throw a car seat in the 2 seater.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oxnard
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Saint_Spinner,Apr 4 2006, 10:02 AM
I got a question for you: Why do you keep making stupid threads and never go back to reply to them?
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO the STI is the type of car where you either LOVE it or HATE it theres no in between... in other words an enthusiasts car only. The S2k is universally loved by chicks, dudes whatever.
Again like someone stated earlier you have to compare apples to apples.
Sedan or coupe? Hard top or convertible? Speed or better handling? Turbo or n/a? I can go on like this. Just see which car you will have the most fun in and make a choice. Oh and don't forget to drive them both.
My verdict: S2k. nothing beats making that ass spin with the top down on a sunny day.
Again like someone stated earlier you have to compare apples to apples.
Sedan or coupe? Hard top or convertible? Speed or better handling? Turbo or n/a? I can go on like this. Just see which car you will have the most fun in and make a choice. Oh and don't forget to drive them both.
My verdict: S2k. nothing beats making that ass spin with the top down on a sunny day.
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I find amazing is the number of posts this troll continually attracts and that there are people seriously responding to this thread. I mean there are at least 3-4 of these a day from this guy.
#29
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChiMSP,Apr 4 2006, 10:31 AM
IMO the STI is the type of car where you either LOVE it or HATE it theres no in between... in other words an enthusiasts car only. The S2k is universally loved by chicks, dudes whatever.
#30
Registered User
Originally Posted by clayzS2k,Apr 4 2006, 10:23 AM
Are you referring to me bro?