Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

RX7 vs S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-08-2005, 10:34 PM
  #1  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
prelupino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RX7 vs S2000

How is the overall performance of an RX7? Does anyone have experience with them? Do all 3rd gen come with the twin turbo's. It seems a whole lot of them are rebuilt, what should I look out for with a 94 20k rebuilt eng? Thanks in advance.
Old 03-08-2005, 10:37 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Officer_down's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bothell
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do a search! Recently, there have been a couple huge threads comparing these two cars. I don't think there's a need for another one.
Old 03-09-2005, 11:41 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
lukemc01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think Sports Car Illustrated and Road and Track both had used buyer's guides. The engine does seem to need changing earlier than a lot of other cars. But I seem to remember reading that changing one out wasn't terribly expensive, sort of like paying for a major service (~$700 - 1000)
Old 03-09-2005, 02:32 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
brockLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

way more potential than an S2K will ever have, thats a fact. As for handling, its a light car, but I dont know if its as "twitchy" as all of you S2K fans love to talk about. At 2800 lb's, I cant imagine it handling too bad.

If you are worried about reliability, do a LS1 or LS2 swap, you will run better times, keep the same weight, and have almost the same if not way better infinite power potential.
Old 03-09-2005, 02:39 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Officer_down's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bothell
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brockLT1,Mar 9 2005, 03:32 PM
way more potential than an S2K will ever have, thats a fact. As for handling, its a light car, but I dont know if its as "twitchy" as all of you S2K fans love to talk about. At 2800 lb's, I cant imagine it handling too bad.
The RX7 has more power potential because it came as a twin turbo engine from the factory car, so compare that to a 2.0L N/A 4-cyl, of course any turbo engine (or big NA engine) will have more power potential.

As for the handling, BrockLT1, let's just say the RX7 handles a million, scratch that, a billion times better than a Camaro. Very few cars in the history of cars could handle as good as an RX7 from the factory. You don't "drive" the car, you become one with it. That's to give you a brief idea of its handling and driving characteristics, Brock.
Old 03-09-2005, 02:57 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Jamesmic7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The RX7, specifically the 13b in the 3rd gens has a higher power potential, if you want to say it like that, not because of the factory turbo, but because it's a wankel rotary. I'm certainly not going to start a large piston vs. rotary thread here, but to the original poster... If you spend some time on any of the big rx-7 forums, you'll get a feel for the cars very quickly. Owning a turbo rotary car is probably as far as you can get from owning a honda, but when it's running the way you want, you'll forget just about everything else in your life.
Old 03-09-2005, 03:44 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Penforhire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: La Habra
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The last RX7TT is a great car! But you'll never keep all those seals from blowing (or so my rotary-racer friends tell me). In stock form it is almost competitive with the Z06 vette at auto-x. "Turbo surprise" is why most top drivers jumped ship to the Z06 in SuperStock.
Old 03-09-2005, 05:00 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
brockLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Officer_down,Mar 9 2005, 03:39 PM]The RX7 has more power potential because it came as a twin turbo engine from the factory car, so compare that to a 2.0L N/A 4-cyl, of course any turbo engine (or big NA engine) will have more power potential.

As for the handling, BrockLT1, let's just say the RX7 handles a million, scratch that, a billion times better than a Camaro.
Old 03-09-2005, 07:52 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
SilverKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

causing trouble in here to brock?

Yes there have been alot of threads s2kvs rx7.

Cool car but fact is IT WILL BE A GARAGE QUEEN. Don't buy it unless your VERY mechanically inclined.
Old 03-09-2005, 08:00 PM
  #10  
ttb
Registered User

 
ttb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my FD hasn't moved in almost a year. still looks pretty just sitting there though.


Quick Reply: RX7 vs S2000



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 AM.