Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

RSX-S Acceleration

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-11-2006, 03:34 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
LudegarH22A7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Yup GA
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

VTC folks, it's the shit...
Old 02-11-2006, 03:36 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
truths2k05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami Heat won!
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How's that 06 si treating ya?
Old 02-11-2006, 03:44 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
APEXSEAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Juan
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by truths2k05,Feb 11 2006, 08:33 PM
The S2k will feel faster due to being pushed by the Rwd and not pulled as is the case in the Rsx. I also owned the 04 acura TL and that thing made the s2k feel slow. The feeling of acceleration relative to actual acceleration is tricky. For sure that the rsx rev's quicker though.
What I meant to say is that the RSX-S feels quicker than my S when I am the driver. However when I am the passenger I feel exactly the opposite.
Old 02-11-2006, 03:58 PM
  #24  

 
frank b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mahopac N.Y.
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I had an '02 RSX S and now I have an '05. There are some nice improvements on the '05/'06 model. The car is deceptively quick. All I've done to it is changed the intake. The S feels faster but I think one reason is that the S is so much more dramatic, especially in the sound department, and or course, the rwd. Honda did a great job with the RSX. It always "wants" to go faster. The I-Vtec is very smooth right to redline. I'm lucky to have them both. They're both fun rides!
Old 02-11-2006, 04:32 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
LudegarH22A7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Yup GA
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by truths2k05,Feb 11 2006, 07:36 PM
How's that 06 si treating ya?
it's the truth. i added a drop-in filter last night and today chirped hitting third @ 7500 rpm. quickest steering i've ever had in a car. poor lighting is my biggest complaint. must add HID's.
Old 02-12-2006, 09:14 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
truths2k05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami Heat won!
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

frank b we are in the same shoes. Mighty fine rides I agree.
Ludegar I want to race an 06 si and see how it will do against my 06 rsx. I would of already, but I have only seen two here in miami and girls were driving them to work.
Old 02-12-2006, 04:17 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
LudegarH22A7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Yup GA
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

someone posted doing several runs that were neck and neck... win one, lose one... i think the Si was green and the RSX-S may have had CAI. i have yet to see another Si. but i've only seen about three RSX-S too, i see base models rather frequently. i've also seen more women pushing the brand new S2000's. notice all of the older cars are usually driven by guys both young and old.
Old 02-13-2006, 12:07 PM
  #28  
Registered User

 
sahtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The RSX-S is a great car for its purpose/design. It is not unusual for their K20 engines to produce 230-245whp, 160-170wtq with a few grand in bolt-ons and good tuning. They can easily be pushed to 8600-8800 relatively stock and several have reached 13-14k rpms "reliably" by shops. I have done a lot of work on my roomates RSX-S. He is in the mid 14's on street tires with full bolt-ons and no tuning, stock redline etc. With hondata or K-pro he should be 14 flat or better.

I really wish it was a little easier to produce 280-290 bhp in the F20 to compete. However, it is not a fair competition because the K20's potential was suffocated whereas the s2k's was pushed to near the max in stock form. You can gain 15-18whp from a header on a k20, that alone with the drivetrain loss difference produces F20 numbers.
Old 02-13-2006, 01:04 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
LudegarH22A7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Yup GA
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The F-series is only lacking VTC, that's it... We really should have received this in 2004. that's the only issue. The stock head will flow 300hp NA, no problem. on the + side, this leaves a smidget of hope for a new model.
Old 02-13-2006, 02:09 PM
  #30  
Registered User

 
koala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LudegarH22A7,Feb 13 2006, 04:04 PM
The F-series is only lacking VTC, that's it... We really should have received this in 2004. that's the only issue. The stock head will flow 300hp NA, no problem. on the + side, this leaves a smidget of hope for a new model.
You can't just go and add VTC to the F series block. It's not that simple.


Quick Reply: RSX-S Acceleration



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 AM.