RDX hits Dealers today.
07-19-2006, 08:24 AM
#21
Originally Posted by NJTom2000,Jul 19 2006, 08:30 AM
I like the RDX but decided to go with a Mazda.
For about 31k we picked up a fully loaded Mazda CX-7. Two tone leather, voice-navi, rear back up camera, keyless ignition, AWD, Xenon, proven mazdaspeed6 turbo.
What did I give up over the RDX? The more advanced SHAWD drivetrain is the one main thing I can think of.
IMO the Mazda is a really good looking small-ute with some style while the RDX is a bit bland.
For the 7k+ difference the mazda was a no brainer.
For about 31k we picked up a fully loaded Mazda CX-7. Two tone leather, voice-navi, rear back up camera, keyless ignition, AWD, Xenon, proven mazdaspeed6 turbo.
What did I give up over the RDX? The more advanced SHAWD drivetrain is the one main thing I can think of.
IMO the Mazda is a really good looking small-ute with some style while the RDX is a bit bland.
For the 7k+ difference the mazda was a no brainer.
You did save $7K, and that's probably what I'd have done too.
07-19-2006, 09:05 AM
#22
The MPG ratings on this turbocharged 4 sucks. I mean with gas where it is and in the future...anything that has a teen city MPG rating is just trash IMHO, unless it does 0-60 in less than 4.5 secons 
If they are going to use this engine in the TSX coupe then they can have it.
If they are going to use this engine in the TSX coupe then they can have it.
07-19-2006, 02:59 PM
#25
RAV4 interior is nowhere near the RDX. Probably isn't as sporty, but definitely should be as quick.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joeLTron
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
5
02-11-2006 07:49 AM
airgate
Car and Bike Talk
19
05-14-2003 06:47 PM