Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

R8 vs. GT-R vs. AMV8 vs. 911CS

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-14-2008, 04:52 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
565565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: bobville
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dickiejohnson,Aug 14 2008, 04:44 PM
Cool format, but a bit troublesome.

Can someone interpret this statement about the GT-R?



I understand they're praising it, but what's red wine gum?
Some crazy european expression probably.

Those crazy europeans....
Old 08-14-2008, 04:59 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
JakeJewler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I really want to drive this GT-R. The jarring ride is still unacceptable to me at the alleged 70k nobody will pay. At least it dosent send the steering wheel nuts.
Old 08-14-2008, 05:13 PM
  #13  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The explain the wine gums early in the article -- they're a type of candy, and the author saves his favorite flavor, red, for last.

Wikipedia is your friend, by the way.
Old 08-14-2008, 05:52 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
dickiejohnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh, so it's a "gummy bear", so to speak. At first I thought it was a chewing gum that contains wine.

According to Wiki, wine gum doesn't actually contain wine.
Old 08-14-2008, 07:10 PM
  #15  
Registered User

 
ashamouel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And being the red wine gum means it is the best.
Old 08-15-2008, 12:14 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Glendale
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would get the R8 or new Carrera S w/PDK & call it a day.
Old 08-15-2008, 12:31 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Aze85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: No.VA
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dickiejohnson,Aug 14 2008, 07:44 PM
Cool format, but a bit troublesome.

Can someone interpret this statement about the GT-R?



I understand they're praising it, but what's red wine gum?
hahahaha
red wine gum is a gummy candy. just like the gummy life savers.
i just found out what they are last week. they apparently have them for sale at AMC movie theaters. they taste OK, but smell really funky.
Old 08-22-2008, 04:36 AM
  #18  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

The initial writer (Jethro Bovingdon) seems to be fairly naive/ignorant/biased, quite frankly. His opening statement had me wondering if he'd just gotten out of diapers. I quote:

"A lot has been written about the Porsche 911 over the years - tall tales of snap-oversteer, unpredictability, and an appetite for punishing those who dare push to its limits."
Tall tales of snap oversteer? An appetite for punishing those who dare push to its limits? Nothing tall about those tales - the cars were notorious for lift-throttle shenanigans (far worse than a typical car) and the number of accidents caused by said attribute, combined with unskilled or overconfident driving, is huge. Tim Horton (Canadians will know him well) was killed when his 911 snap oversteered. From the 993 backwards, the 911 has always required a significant amount of skill and care to drive quickly.

He later says his first Porsche he drove was a 996, a car that had the snap oversteer pretty much completely dialed out of it in anything remotely resembling sane driving. The 993, on the other hand, was still quite tail happy and prior generations were even worse. Not sure why he'd ever say that the 911's tendency to snap oversteer is a "tall tale", except because he's ignorant or just a Porsche nut.

He also misused the word "illicit" on page 5. He should have used "elicit"....

Other than that, seems to be a great article with some nice perspectives on each car. Great photos, great roads, and the new PDK transmission sounds like a gem. I do wonder about the 911 losing some of its steering feel, though, as the steering on the 911 has always been quite good, almost a trademark.
Old 08-22-2008, 05:50 PM
  #19  

 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 11,613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My dad never had problems w/ snap oversteer on his old '79 911 SC. Just like the early S2000's, you have to stay on the gas through the corner at high cornering forces, even when instinct may be to let off.

Snap oversteer usually refers to someone running out of driving talent.
Old 08-23-2008, 04:56 AM
  #20  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,Aug 22 2008, 07:50 PM
My dad never had problems w/ snap oversteer on his old '79 911 SC. Just like the early S2000's, you have to stay on the gas through the corner at high cornering forces, even when instinct may be to let off.

Snap oversteer usually refers to someone running out of driving talent.
Absolutely agree. If you drive the car correctly, you won't lose it...but that goes for EVERY car. The 911s were notorious for biting you hard and quick with not a lot of warning or chance of recovery. Steady-state cornering is perhaps a more obvious time to not be letting off the gas but the 911 was also bad in quick transitions or consecutive corners where you had to "swing" the car back and forth.

My problem with the writer was that he completely dismissed such notions about the 911. The problems were very real and undeniable. The 911 was not a forgiving car at all...


Quick Reply: R8 vs. GT-R vs. AMV8 vs. 911CS



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 PM.