Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

PORSCHE ON FIRE!

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-03-2009, 01:08 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
mrkim019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Saratoga
Posts: 4,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought Porsche killed this and the Cayenne??
Old 11-03-2009, 01:29 PM
  #42  

 
cbehney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: No VA
Posts: 2,687
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by esmith51,Nov 3 2009, 08:21 AM
It's fast. It handles. It's a Porsche. Then you get out of the driver seat and have to come to the realization that it looks like the 911 that got knocked up. The Estoque concept or the Quattraporte however, are exquisite examples of beautiful 4 door sports sedans. Seems like another case of marketing researchers and accountants designing cars rather than leaving it to the people that are truly passionate about it. IBTL
Wait, are you saying marketing or accounting designed the car??

Old 11-03-2009, 01:35 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
triman54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winter Springs, Fl.
Posts: 6,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's BMW ugly!
Old 11-03-2009, 01:36 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Steponme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How can a 4000-lb car with only 500hp get to 60 in 3.3 (albeit with AWD)? Ah never mind! The GT-R can also do that on a good day. But that is very fast!
Old 11-03-2009, 05:57 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
esmith51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm saying that accountants and people who pay attention to statistical data of what might produce a marketable car designed it rather, than someone who is passionate about the automobile. For example the Pontiac Aztek, statistically it was supposed to be one of the best selling cars ever. It turned out to be a total flop. I am not implying by any means that the car is a technological marvel, with a outstanding chassis, and excellent power. I'm just saying that I personally (and many people that would consider something that performs like it does), would love the way it performed and handled but, unfortunately, the pleasure derived driving the car would be overshadowed by the aesthetics.
Old 11-03-2009, 06:32 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
SpudRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Porsche has never been able to grasp "beautiful". Every car they've ever made has been just plain odd with the possible exception of the Cayman.

911? Odd for 35 years.
Boxster? Odd.
Cayman? Stylists screwed up. This one looks great.
914? Odd.
928? Odd.
944? Well, actually sort of mainstream for its time.
Cayenne? Really odd.
Panamera? Surprise, odd again.

Consummate engineering and clueless styling are the hallmark of Porsche design.
Old 11-03-2009, 06:34 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Jacques79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It has ''Porsche'' written on the back because buyers will want fellow drivers to notice that they have the latest hottest new toy from Stuttgart since it doesn't look like a classical Porsche.

Pretty lame if you ask me.

Yes it's ugly but the thing that bothers me the most is the asking price. How is this car more expensive to build than a 911?
Old 11-03-2009, 06:36 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Jacques79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpudRacer,Nov 3 2009, 07:32 PM
Porsche has never been able to grasp "beautiful". Every car they've ever made has been just plain odd with the possible exception of the Cayman.

911? Odd for 35 years.
Boxster? Odd.
Cayman? Stylists screwed up. This one looks great.
914? Odd.
928? Odd.
944? Well, actually sort of mainstream for its time.
Cayenne? Really odd.
Panamera? Surprise, odd again.

Consummate engineering and clueless styling are the hallmark of Porsche design.
That's funny tons of drivers tell me my Boxster S is a great looking car.

And every guy-girl I know goes ''wow that's a beautiful car'' when they see a 911-Boxster-Cayman...
Old 11-03-2009, 06:37 PM
  #49  

 
Bugsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 8,446
Received 26 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpudRacer,Nov 3 2009, 11:32 PM
Porsche has never been able to grasp "beautiful". Every car they've ever made has been just plain odd with the possible exception of the Cayman.

911? Odd for 35 years.
Boxster? Odd.
Cayman? Stylists screwed up. This one looks great.
914? Odd.
928? Odd.
944? Well, actually sort of mainstream for its time.
Cayenne? Really odd.
Panamera? Surprise, odd again.

Consummate engineering and clueless styling are the hallmark of Porsche design.
Cayman is a cool car, just short on power like the NSX. Those two really compare to each other.

I'll disagree with you on the 911, but I'm a little biased towards the wide bodied versions. The narrow is just a little....odd.
Old 11-03-2009, 07:38 PM
  #50  

 
Chris S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 11,613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by S2KNFR,Nov 3 2009, 09:37 PM
Cayman is a cool car, just short on power like the NSX.
Since when did a car capable of a 4.4 sec. 0-60 time and 12.9 sec. 1/4 mile become underpowered?


Quick Reply: PORSCHE ON FIRE!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 AM.