Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Porsche 718 Boxster & Boxster S Switch to Turbo 4s

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-14-2016, 11:51 AM
  #101  
Registered User

 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,485
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mosesbotbol
Originally Posted by Purple Haze' timestamp='1466780217' post='24001390
It's a sad time for me who is beginning to shop for Cayman S's. Do I scramble to buy a 6 cylinder 2016 as they quickly sell away or settle for a new, 2017 turbo 4?
If looking for "an investment", I'd get the 6 cylinder. Looking for the most performance go for the turbo.
The only 6 cyl Cayman that could even remotely considered an 'investment' is a GT4 with carbon bucket seats.
Old 10-14-2016, 12:04 PM
  #102  
Member (Premium)
 
vader1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: MAHT-O-MEDI
Posts: 11,857
Received 438 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
Originally Posted by mosesbotbol' timestamp='1466783274' post='24001440
[quote name='Purple Haze' timestamp='1466780217' post='24001390']
It's a sad time for me who is beginning to shop for Cayman S's. Do I scramble to buy a 6 cylinder 2016 as they quickly sell away or settle for a new, 2017 turbo 4?
If looking for "an investment", I'd get the 6 cylinder. Looking for the most performance go for the turbo.
The only 6 cyl Cayman that could even remotely considered an 'investment' is a GT4 with carbon bucket seats.
[/quote]


I suppose I would agree with that to some extent. They will depreciate, but I can see ten years from now when they have been long gone for some time they gain a following like air cooled 911's. I don't think you would make money, but the potential to drive one for a long time only to find you get 75% of what you paid way down the road is a distinct possibility.

They could become collectable 30 years from now and be worth more than you paid, but that will be more a function of inflation and having a low production cult car than having some super rare Ferrari kind of thing. I almost got what I paid for my S2000 12 years after buying it as a lease return. But that was due to the inflationary increase in used car prices and new car prices as well, not due to it being some instant classic.
Old 10-14-2016, 01:36 PM
  #103  

 
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Received 118 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I think I'm with CosmosMpower on this one. I think that six cylinder Caymans will enjoy some enthusiast love, so they may go back up in value a little bit (or their depreciation may taper off). But they're still 13 second cars in a world where an off-the-shelf Mustang will run low 12s. I think that will hurt them. Cars are just getting so fast these days that it makes yesterday's decent performers seem slow.
Old 10-14-2016, 02:36 PM
  #104  
Registered User

 
Da New Yawka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

They are actually faster then a stock Mustang GT...

12.7 for a Cayman S. I think the Mustang GT is at a 13.0 depending on what mag is doing the acceleration test.
Old 10-14-2016, 03:20 PM
  #105  

 
JamesD89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 734
Received 60 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review

11.9 second quarter in a Boxster S
Old 10-15-2016, 04:03 PM
  #106  
Registered User

 
duffsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 296
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Frida83
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review

11.9 second quarter in a Boxster S
I find the $93k sticker much more surprising (Or just disappointing?) than the 11.9.
Old 10-15-2016, 05:54 PM
  #107  

 
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Received 118 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Da New Yawka
They are actually faster then a stock Mustang GT...

12.7 for a Cayman S. I think the Mustang GT is at a 13.0 depending on what mag is doing the acceleration test.
I was thinking of the older Cayman, but still, fair point.
Old 10-15-2016, 05:55 PM
  #108  

 
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,280
Received 118 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frida83
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review

11.9 second quarter in a Boxster S
Yeah, that's kind of my point. You sacrifice a lot (like a freaking 11 second quarter mile) in order to play the "but at least it's a six cylinder" card.
Old 10-17-2016, 05:53 AM
  #109  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Doesn't seem to be holding back the air-cooled market, where cars are at 5s (or more) to 60mph and yet they're commanding $60K+ for basic higher-mileage cars and $100K+ for more desirable models. Sometimes it's about "purity" (perceived or otherwise) rather than performance.
Old 10-18-2016, 08:55 AM
  #110  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,431
Received 281 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

In my opinion, for a car on the street, once it can hit 60 mph in less than 5 seconds who cares? Then it's all about the sound of the engine, the accuracy and feedback of the steering. That's why people love older Turbos and 993s.


Quick Reply: Porsche 718 Boxster & Boxster S Switch to Turbo 4s



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 AM.