Please help. S2000 vs. Solstice(looks only)
02-27-2010, 03:22 PM
#13
The Solstice is funky-looking and will look outdated very soon. The S has classic lines and still looks very good on the road; not so much in stock photos.
The S has one of the best-looking front ends, IMO:
The rear and hind quarters need some work.
The S has one of the best-looking front ends, IMO:
The rear and hind quarters need some work.
02-27-2010, 03:49 PM
#14
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Solstice looks cheap. Huge panel gaps, lots of plastic - it works a stand in sports car on a billboard or television commercial because it does have a great overall shape, but in person the appeal quickly fades when materials and fit and finish come into play.
S2000 for me.
S2000 for me.
02-27-2010, 03:59 PM
#16
Originally Posted by rnye,Feb 27 2010, 06:49 PM
The Solstice looks cheap. Huge panel gaps, lots of plastic
02-27-2010, 04:16 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont like the solstice what so ever, i think its awful in every way. I however do find the sky's more appealing esspacially the GXP coupes. They are pretty sharp. but interms of fit and finish and overall quality the sky and solstice are the same.
02-27-2010, 07:34 PM
#18
Originally Posted by Bliss@5200,Feb 27 2010, 09:16 PM
I however do find the sky's more appealing esspacially the GXP coupes. They are pretty sharp. but interms of fit and finish and overall quality the sky and solstice are the same.
02-27-2010, 09:08 PM
#20
S2000 vs Solstice--the S2000 wins by far IMO.
S2000 vs Sky would make for a much better debate. I think the Sky is a much nicer looking car than the Solstice.
I think with the Sky, the look is good but in a more trendy style. The S2000 has rather classic proportions. Sometimes I think the Sky looks better, but then when they drive by, they don't really catch my eye the same way, so I go back and forth.
I do think the Kappas don't have near the fit and finish of the S. The S is dated in some ways, but it never feels cheap or low quality to me. The Kappas do, unfortunately.
S2000 vs Sky would make for a much better debate. I think the Sky is a much nicer looking car than the Solstice.
I think with the Sky, the look is good but in a more trendy style. The S2000 has rather classic proportions. Sometimes I think the Sky looks better, but then when they drive by, they don't really catch my eye the same way, so I go back and forth.
I do think the Kappas don't have near the fit and finish of the S. The S is dated in some ways, but it never feels cheap or low quality to me. The Kappas do, unfortunately.