NSX successor to be announced tonight!
#41
I'm with hpark in terms of what I'd like to see, in general:
4.0L V8 - 450 hp, 300 ft-lbs of torque (double the S2000, roughly)
3100 lbs
$70K
I say go for the targa - while it's not a performance enhancement, most people like having that semi-convertible option and it doesn't kill the car in terms of weight or handling. Better sales in the end, I think.
That said, I think the reasonable stats will be closer to:
4.0L V8 - 380 hp, 290 ft-lbs
3200 lbs
$80K
4.0L V8 - 450 hp, 300 ft-lbs of torque (double the S2000, roughly)
3100 lbs
$70K
I say go for the targa - while it's not a performance enhancement, most people like having that semi-convertible option and it doesn't kill the car in terms of weight or handling. Better sales in the end, I think.
That said, I think the reasonable stats will be closer to:
4.0L V8 - 380 hp, 290 ft-lbs
3200 lbs
$80K
#44
Registered User
Originally Posted by jsalicru,Jul 12 2005, 04:50 PM
... and then you woke up.
"We are committed to having an ultra high-performance vehicle in the Acura lineup in the future," said John Mendel, senior vice president, automobile operations. "It's too early to comment on specifics, but the all-new model will be just as groundbreaking as the 1991 NSX."
5 word barbs are fun, I know I love em, but give your opinion.
#45
Originally Posted by s2kpdx01,Jul 12 2005, 02:10 PM
Well, if I'm dreaming then I won't be buying a NSX. If it is going to cost anywhere near the old one it should at least compete against the Z06. If not why design a new one? So you can sell 50 a year again!?!? I guess one could argue it could cost a lot less, but the press release says honda wants a ...
That says to me it had better be pretty damn fast, ultra high-performance means fast too me. 500HP is the new standard, if you can't hit that you aren't running with the big boys, unless you are a skinny little bastard (read: low weight).
That says to me it had better be pretty damn fast, ultra high-performance means fast too me. 500HP is the new standard, if you can't hit that you aren't running with the big boys, unless you are a skinny little bastard (read: low weight).
The point is not to compete with the Vette, unless it's the base 400 hp version. The point is more to compete with Porsche and their 997. 400 hp should be sufficient (vs. the 355 of the Carrera S) - 450 hp should allow it to whup on anything short of a Viper or C6 Z06. Probably give a Ferrari 430 a run for its money.
The new Z06, performance wise, is going to be the king of anything under $100K (maybe more). However, in terms of class, panache, sophistication, and taste, it just isn't going to work. That's why people still buy Porsches and the like. The NSX will be a little more sophisticated in every aspect, I imagine, and will compete with Porsche directly.
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This new vehicle may be perfectly timed to coincide with Honda's planned buyout of British American Racing. Once Honda has their own 100% factory F1 team, they will have an even greater need to build and market an "ultra high performance" sportscar. They don't want to do it as an afterthought like Toyota.
#47
Registered User
Originally Posted by The Hoth,Jul 12 2005, 07:03 AM
The weight of the batteries are probably gonna kill the sportiness of the new NSX though.
kills sportiness my ass.
True, add in another 100 pounds for a torquey electric motor. I don't think the IMA motors weight that much at 2" thick either.
If they could do a 4.0L V8 with 450-480HP (well within Honda's means IMO) along with the low-end grunt of a decent sized 40HP elec. motor (which would provide maybe a gas+elec 450lb-ft total torque at the low-mid range) you're talking about a car with close to 500HP with the low-end of a 5-6L gas engine...along with the good mileage in relaxed driving.
I'm pretty sure the above can be done with techniques such as hydroforming at a weight at or under 3000lb.
#50
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eyescream,Jul 13 2005, 02:19 AM
no they should keep the RWD...
4.0 liter v8
450 hp 290lbs
70k