NSX King of it's day?
#11
its wierd to hate a particular car like this guy does.
maybe something happened in his childhood.... maybe some dude in an nsx kicked his ass and made him cry?
anyways.. i think this pic is much more interesting
maybe something happened in his childhood.... maybe some dude in an nsx kicked his ass and made him cry?
anyways.. i think this pic is much more interesting
#14
The NSX may not have been very impressive in this comparison, but at the time of its release it was a bargain. It was head and shoulders above the 348, but then it was joined by tons of competition. Most rivals did not match the NSX in all areas (handling, reliability, livability, etc), but its power deficiency started to grow with competition like the Viper, Supra, etc.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by steve c
A couple of you all could do with some reading lessons.
A couple of you all could do with some reading lessons.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Moscow
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by steve c
A couple of you all could do with some reading lessons.
A couple of you all could do with some reading lessons.
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ahh, it just shows what most NSX owners have been saying. The NSX is not a good drag race car.
Also, if the 1/4 mile is 1320ft, and the NA1 3.0 5-Speed NSX traps the 1/4 mile at about 104MPH, then why does it take it 1334ft to reach 100MPH in this test? Was this NSX tested an automatic? A 3.0 NSX should be reaching 100MPH before it reaches the 1/4 mile 91320) point.
Also, if the 1/4 mile is 1320ft, and the NA1 3.0 5-Speed NSX traps the 1/4 mile at about 104MPH, then why does it take it 1334ft to reach 100MPH in this test? Was this NSX tested an automatic? A 3.0 NSX should be reaching 100MPH before it reaches the 1/4 mile 91320) point.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: La Massana, Principat D'Andorra
Posts: 3,796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by rai
Interesting chart, no one has said the NSX was the fastest car of it's time...
The NSX was a "poor man's F 348".
Interesting chart, no one has said the NSX was the fastest car of it's time...
The NSX was a "poor man's F 348".
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ChrisK
Ahh, it just shows what most NSX owners have been saying. The NSX is not a good drag race car.
Also, if the 1/4 mile is 1320ft, and the NA1 3.0 5-Speed NSX traps the 1/4 mile at about 104MPH, then why does it take it 1334ft to reach 100MPH in this test? Was this NSX tested an automatic? A 3.0 NSX should be reaching 100MPH before it reaches the 1/4 mile 91320) point.
Ahh, it just shows what most NSX owners have been saying. The NSX is not a good drag race car.
Also, if the 1/4 mile is 1320ft, and the NA1 3.0 5-Speed NSX traps the 1/4 mile at about 104MPH, then why does it take it 1334ft to reach 100MPH in this test? Was this NSX tested an automatic? A 3.0 NSX should be reaching 100MPH before it reaches the 1/4 mile 91320) point.
http://corvettearchive.com/images/1994/RTA...Apr94/page9.jpg
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Irvine
Posts: 8,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rai
Interesting chart, no one has said the NSX was the fastest car of it's time...
The NSX was a "poor man's F 348".
That motorcycle is fast, I mean faster than an Enzo (?)
Interesting tidbit in the text for all those TL fanatics
Interesting chart, no one has said the NSX was the fastest car of it's time...
The NSX was a "poor man's F 348".
That motorcycle is fast, I mean faster than an Enzo (?)
Interesting tidbit in the text for all those TL fanatics