Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

NO FREAKIN' WAY!

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-19-2009, 09:20 AM
  #11  
Registered User

 
Young_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 5,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by [DT
,Feb 19 2009, 11:52 AM] Insurance is affected by the cost, cost for repair, seating, drivetrain, number of accidents/fatalities, demographics, your age, etc., etc.

It's a bit of magical mojo.

What happens - which I suspect is your case - is some cars are more expensive (and likely more expensive to repair), *however*, statistically, they are involved in far less accidents (which is largely affected by the demographics of the owners).

I've run a C5, C6, Viper and 911TT through my "get a quote" system for my carrier, and the 911 is always $200 less per six months than any of the others.
yeah magical bullshit
Old 02-19-2009, 09:54 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
ace123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

i was planning to get one of those right up until i got married. my wife's in med school, so i had to find something cheaper to buy and maintain.

the styling is ok, and it's a heavy GT not a sports car, but those engines sound SOO good! congrats.
Old 02-19-2009, 09:56 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
dombey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the majority of your insurance bill is driven by the chances of you crashing. s2000 = likely to crash. Maserati = not likely to crash.
Old 02-19-2009, 12:44 PM
  #14  
Registered User

 
Vik2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Behind You
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

These old Maserati depreciated crazy enough to be affordable. Still don't know how possibly anyone thinks that car is nice looking. Just very odd looking...
Old 02-19-2009, 01:49 PM
  #15  
Registered User

 
txjeepn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It does not suprise me, if you look at the new car guide in the back of TopGear magazine they have the UK insurance group that a car is in. Its a scale of 1-20 the S2000 is in group 20. Even the civic type R is group 17. I know this is a chart from the UK but it probably does give a realistic idea. A miata is group 13. And with my insurance with the same coverage no tickets the insurance on my 2001 S2000 is 20% more than my wifes 2006 MX-5.
Old 02-19-2009, 02:23 PM
  #16  
Registered User

 
Bz2005s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by txjeepn,Feb 19 2009, 03:49 PM
It does not suprise me, if you look at the new car guide in the back of TopGear magazine they have the UK insurance group that a car is in. Its a scale of 1-20 the S2000 is in group 20.
Scale is similar here in the US for Farmers at least.

My buddy was so surprised when he saw that my S was in the highest category when I first insured it. We tried to think of other high risk cars that might be in the same category and we could not think of a single one. We tried about 30 different cars and put them in the system to see. Even a Vette was one notch down from the S

Of course this does not mean that insurance is less on an S then it would be on a new Vette. Value of the car factors in after the fact as well
Old 02-19-2009, 02:27 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
EVAN&MONICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 22,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know just about everyone thinks there way cool, but I think there Fugly
Old 02-19-2009, 03:04 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Christople's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Corn Country
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

part of the reason why i ditched the s2000 for the miata

cheaper tires/insurance/parts
Old 02-19-2009, 09:09 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
supahman04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well the look of the maserati is exotic. Not for everyone, thats for sure. But it also seems safer. The S is practically a beer can on wheels. Hence the speed. But that might play into the insurance factor. I guess im just maturing a bit out of the 2 seater that has cost me ALOT of money with parts/tickets/insurance and into something I might put a set of wheels on and be done with it.

I will say that the M128 does not look half as sexy as the new Grand Turismo tho!!!!

Old 02-19-2009, 10:42 PM
  #20  

 
liquid_helix136's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,289
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

when i was looking for a new car i was picking between an s2k, boxster and a TT.. decided no on the TT and was checkin boxster prices, which were along the lines of the s2k, i liked it had the nice porsche brand, mid engined etc. etc. and i was thinking ah porsche insurance is gonna be a ton more though..

Looked it up and it was cheaper to insure a boxster than it was my current (at the time) 98 prelude

i was shocked


Quick Reply: NO FREAKIN' WAY!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 PM.