Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Nissan 350Z Roadster (many pics - not 56k-friendly, duh)

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-21-2003, 04:17 PM
  #21  
Former Moderator

 
Ubetit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Columbus
Posts: 10,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks much better with the top down but I like it. I'm not trading my S2000 for one but I'll be happy to see them on the road.
Old 04-21-2003, 06:26 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
SanchothePanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Poway
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It looks better in motion.
Old 04-21-2003, 07:01 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
NoMoreWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ba
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like there should be a big engine in the rear of the car.
They should have shortened the frame by 4 inches. There is a ton of room in that rear deck.

Instead they took the hatch and chopped the roof. It's nice, but would be so much better if they dropped some weight. I think motor trend said the weight would increase by 200-300lbs and the price would be around 35k.

Maybe the rear deck looks so long because of the body matched cover.


I think the car fits nicely between the s2k and mustang vert.
S2k Low HP low Weight
350Z Medium HP Medium weight
Mustang Vert HIGH hp HIGH weight (3780 lbs. for the cobra)

I think it's great to see all these options

-Ed
Old 04-21-2003, 07:13 PM
  #24  
mas
Registered User
 
mas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good pics. The roadster is not bad at all.
Old 04-21-2003, 07:21 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
RazorV3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: VA is for hustlaz
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it doesn't look right, id rather get the tintop version.
Old 04-21-2003, 07:42 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
SHIRI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by xpander4
[B]Hideous imo.
Old 04-21-2003, 07:48 PM
  #27  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
alexf20c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Come see me after class.
Posts: 20,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

On that note, I'm reading my EVO and they review the new Aston DB7 GT. The damn thing came out 10 years ago but still looks prototype-new. Sad to say the Vanquish already looks 5 times its age.
Old 04-21-2003, 09:15 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
copperhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In real life the 350Z looks awesome. I use to think it was kinda ugly, but on the road it is sweet. The G35 coupe is the best looking japanese car on the road right now. I have seen them in Diamond Graphite and Black and they are simply awesome! I wish infiniti would make a hardtop convertible of the G35 coupe.

The 350Z roadster looks good in the silver colors with the tan seats. There are some autoshow pics of this out on the net.
Old 04-21-2003, 10:39 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
rich5842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chino
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree with SHIRI. The previous Z stills looks pretty nice for a car that's been out that long ago. You can make an argument for the other Nissan cars being dated easily, but not their Z! IMO, the Supra looks more dated and that came out after the Z.
Old 04-22-2003, 08:04 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Habiib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by xpander4


Quick Reply: Nissan 350Z Roadster (many pics - not 56k-friendly, duh)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 PM.