Nissan 350Z GT-S
10-17-2006, 08:22 AM
#21
Registered User
Originally Posted by nalVle,Oct 17 2006, 01:50 PM
QUICKAG - and i would take the blown 4.6 over the LS2 any day of the week. they're both gonna run fine if they're new...
-Chris
-Chris
10-17-2006, 11:18 AM
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danbury/New Haven, CT
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by s2kpdx01,Oct 17 2006, 11:22 AM
Let's say you are right. I don't think you are, but that's just my opinion. Why would you pick the blown 4.6 over the LS2?
-Chris
10-17-2006, 11:39 AM
#23
Registered User
Originally Posted by vader1,Oct 17 2006, 02:17 PM
Nearly 400 hp and not THAT much quicker than R&T tested a 250hp Legacy for $26k. (real world price)
10-17-2006, 12:06 PM
#24
Registered User
i'd take the 03-04 terminators over the gt500 anyday if highway missile are my thing.
at the 40k+ bracket i'd take the c6 in a heartbeat, maybe even save up a bit more for the z51 package.
an SC'ed 350z will be cool for building a highway car (even though handling wont be that bad either) - it stills weighs less than the terminator IIRC
at the 40k+ bracket i'd take the c6 in a heartbeat, maybe even save up a bit more for the z51 package.
an SC'ed 350z will be cool for building a highway car (even though handling wont be that bad either) - it stills weighs less than the terminator IIRC
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
W6DAN
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
13
03-05-2003 11:15 AM