Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

New BMW 'M' roadster coming in late 2005?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-08-2005, 12:41 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Ridgeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

those pics are ~2 years old

as someone above stated, iirc page 33 of this months roundel reports that the MZ4 will ge tthe same 4.0L 400hp V8 that will go into the e90 M3

I wouldn't think BMW would keep producing the s54 just for a low production car such as a MZ4. So, the new M roadster will either debut with the 3.2L I6 & then transition to the 4.0L V8, similar to the last gen M roadsters transition, or simply start with the V8.
IMO I bet that depends on when the mz4 debuts. BMW will most definitly want to debut the v8 in the m3 not the z4, hence if the mz4 comes before the m3, increased chance of a 6 vs. 8...

Though I'm still inclined to believe roundel that it will have the v8...I'm sure most ppl would prefer that instead of having the risk of another models engine grenading...
Old 02-08-2005, 12:46 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
pegi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Espoo
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

UGLY !
Still not any feel with Z4.

It might be super fast anyway..
Coupe seems to be nice
Old 02-08-2005, 12:55 PM
  #13  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c' date='Feb 8 2005, 09:55 AM
The last M roadsters (and M coupes) that used the M3's S54 motor were a hoot -- and fairly quick. One of the moderators over at bimmerforums.com with loads of experience ripped of a 12.556 in a stock one...

While I would welcome the return of the M roadster, man that Z4 is ugly.
Holy cow! Are you serious? I thought they were really low 13s cars at best - perhaps high 12s (ie, right around where an NSX is). That's right there with a Z06 in the hands of a moderately decent driver...
Old 02-08-2005, 01:01 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
derryck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Orange Park
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as someone above stated, iirc page 33 of this months roundel reports that the MZ4 will ge tthe same 4.0L 400hp V8 that will go into the e90 M3
Yep, BMW will stop taking orders for the E46 M3 sometime during the second quarter of this year. The Z4M (or whatever they call it) will have the V8 slated for the E90 M3. And for the person who said the Z4 enging bay will easily fit a V12...what V12 is that? Both Hartge and AC Schnitzer have Z4's fitted with V8's and they both had to 'adjust' the engine bay to accomadate the V8.
Old 02-08-2005, 01:02 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Planets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FUGLY.

I could care less if it ran 12's, still can't get past the exterior styling.
Old 02-08-2005, 03:24 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Neely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Still looks like a deformed shoe/rhino/shark (and not a cool shark).
Old 02-08-2005, 03:37 PM
  #17  
Moderator

 
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SJC
Posts: 109,141
Received 1,566 Likes on 1,437 Posts
Default

That's it. . . I'm going to Munich with a bull horn:

"Moechten Sie bitte ein neues Automobil-Design-Studio finden?"

I ain't leaving until they come out with a design that doesn't make me (and most everyone I know) go, "What the hell they thinkin'?"

Nice of them to get the Z4 to go faster, though! Toll!
Old 02-08-2005, 03:50 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
hpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c' date='Feb 8 2005, 07:55 AM
The last M roadsters (and M coupes) that used the M3's S54 motor were a hoot -- and fairly quick. One of the moderators over at bimmerforums.com with loads of experience ripped of a 12.556 in a stock one...

While I would welcome the return of the M roadster, man that Z4 is ugly.
yeah i agree....engine is SOOOO nice and it should handle better than the outgoing M roadster......
but ///M really needs to replace EVERY body panel (front and rear lights too)......looks hideous
Old 02-08-2005, 04:33 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Holy cow! Are you serious?
Yep. You are correct though in that most were low 13 second cars. In general they are a tick or two faster than the heavier E46M3.

Now here is a stupid statement. My 02 S54 M coupe "felt" like a low 13 second car. It certainly gave no inklings as to being a Z06 killer.
Old 02-08-2005, 07:52 PM
  #20  
Registered User

 
Warren J. Dew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Posts: 1,135
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c' date='Feb 8 2005, 07:55 AM
While I would welcome the return of the M roadster, man that Z4 is ugly.
You ain't seen nothing 'til you've seen the inside.


Quick Reply: New BMW 'M' roadster coming in late 2005?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 AM.