McLaren P1 Performance numbers

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

10-23-2013, 06:12 AM

deepbluejh

Registered User

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2010

Location: Atlanta, GA

Posts: 3,726

Likes: 0

Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

McLaren P1 Performance numbers

In a nutshell:

0-62mph: 2.8secs

0-124mph: 6.8secs

0-186mph: 16.5secs

Standing quarter: 9.8secs at 152mph

Fuel Economy: 34mpg (!)

More details here: http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/m...ats-2013-10-21

What an astounding car... that standing quarter mile is just nuts!

Reply Like

10-23-2013, 06:19 AM

rockville

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Palo Alto

Posts: 5,387

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepbluejh

Very impressive. Is the MPG UK or US gallons?

Reply Like

10-23-2013, 07:19 AM

Mr.E.G.

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 6,280

Likes: 187

Received 117 Likes on 68 Posts

It's UK gallons, but still that comes out about 28 US gallons if I recall correctly.

Reply Like

10-23-2013, 08:13 AM

JonBoy

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 19,712

Likes: 430

Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts

I'd buy one but I require at least 30 (US) mpg in my cars....

Reply Like

10-23-2013, 08:19 AM

rockville

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Palo Alto

Posts: 5,387

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonBoy

I'd buy one but I require at least 30 (US) mpg in my cars....

I've got the same issue....

Well that and the F1 looks SOOOOO much better.

Reply Like

10-23-2013, 08:38 AM

i_heart_my_DB8

Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Scatterbrainia

Posts: 8,586

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

No Cobalt SS, no care.

Reply Like

10-23-2013, 09:30 AM

JonBoy

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 19,712

Likes: 430

Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockville

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonBoy' timestamp='1382544785' post='22842244

I'd buy one but I require at least 30 (US) mpg in my cars....

I've got the same issue....

Well that and the F1 looks SOOOOO much better.

I think the P1 looks way better than the F1, unless we're talking about the LM edition and even then, it'd be close... The F1 needs a wing to look truly great (in my opinion).

Reply Like

Trending Topics

%*!#&%!418st Official Hard At Work Thread!%&#!*%

1.1k

13.5k
Never thought this would happen

26

555
Shooting the Breeze 17-19

5.1k

264.9k
Chasing a misfire

14

388
Future Classics. Do you agree?

12

237

10-23-2013, 09:53 AM

CosmosMpower

Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 7,485

Likes: 1

Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts

152 trap is pretty seriously fast. Still about 10 mph shy of a Switzer R1K-X or Alpha 12 though

Reply Like

10-23-2013, 10:10 AM

rockville

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Palo Alto

Posts: 5,387

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonBoy

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockville' timestamp='1382545194' post='22842257

[quote name='JonBoy' timestamp='1382544785' post='22842244']
I'd buy one but I require at least 30 (US) mpg in my cars....

I've got the same issue....

Well that and the F1 looks SOOOOO much better.

I think the P1 looks way better than the F1, unless we're talking about the LM edition and even then, it'd be close... The F1 needs a wing to look truly great (in my opinion).
[/quote]
You are of course entitled to your opinion... no mater how wrong, against nature, or Canadian it might be.