Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Massive conversion for my CTS-V!

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-24-2014, 08:46 PM
  #11  

 
kevinS2OOO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Wow what's up with S2000 owners buying supercars now

And I am still driving an S2000 and a 93 Accord.
Old 04-25-2014, 05:39 AM
  #12  

 
flexer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,108
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevinS2OOO
Wow what's up with S2000 owners buying supercars now

And I am still driving an S2000 and a 93 Accord.

We are growing up.
Old 04-25-2014, 06:16 AM
  #13  

 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,396
Received 427 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Congrats, I've considered a Turbo to replace my CTS-V as a daily, but I'm still enjoying the V too much. Just put on my 3rd set of tires in 31k miles, some Michelin Super Sports, and the V is comfy when you want it to be and very fast and fun when you are in the mood. The Turbo has a lot of pluses going for it, but it doesn't seem the comfort/performance envelope is quite as wide as the V. It may have a little more performance (and much better traction), but it won't be as comfy in the day to day grind. Of course, you may not care because you're driving a Porsche 911 twin turbo.

Enjoy!
Old 04-25-2014, 06:43 AM
  #14  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Beauty! What year?
Old 04-25-2014, 07:08 AM
  #15  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
d1rtyc4r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 944
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EastS2k
woah nice conversion, how much did it cost you?
68! Never thought they would dip into this price range.

Originally Posted by rnye
That is a beautiful Turbo! One day.. Definitely a bucket lister.
Thanks.

Originally Posted by hellaSleepy
Very nice, congrats! Was the CTS-V just too boring for you?
Not so much boring, but didn't have a certain effect on me like the Porsche does. I always found myself thinking about my old 996tt and how it would be cool to get in another TT sometime.

Originally Posted by Marioshi
Horrifying resemblance to a vw bug in that first exterior shot (I know family ties)
That's hilarious, it does look like one there *shudder*

Originally Posted by kevinS2OOO
And I am still driving an S2000 and a 93 Accord.
I have a 1992 Honda Accord, manual tranny too. It's awesome - I can park it anywhere, it does great in the snow, installing a sound system was insanely easy when you don't give a shit about appearance, ha. I even threw an intake on it from a leftover intake I had on my old STi, it was pretty crazy how much louder and aggressive the motor sounds in that car now.

Originally Posted by QUIKAG
Congrats, I've considered a Turbo to replace my CTS-V as a daily, but I'm still enjoying the V too much. Just put on my 3rd set of tires in 31k miles, some Michelin Super Sports, and the V is comfy when you want it to be and very fast and fun when you are in the mood. The Turbo has a lot of pluses going for it, but it doesn't seem the comfort/performance envelope is quite as wide as the V. It may have a little more performance (and much better traction), but it won't be as comfy in the day to day grind. Of course, you may not care because you're driving a Porsche 911 twin turbo.
Enjoy!
I think if you drove the 997tt just once you'll be convinced. For me, I am actually excited to see 15mpg! I think I averaged 9-10 in my V.

Originally Posted by JonBoy
Beauty! What year?
2007. I almost got a 2010, but the salesman informed me the engines are completely different in that year. I had no idea that when they did the facelifts they changed the engine in the TTs.
Old 04-25-2014, 08:47 AM
  #16  

 
TommyDeVito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,184
Received 410 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Awesome, congrats!
Old 04-25-2014, 09:10 AM
  #17  

 
EastS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,325
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

you actually made a really good call on the 07 vs 10.

I believe in 07 they still had the metzger engine, which is a full race engine block that they use in the race cars even today; granted it's less efficient - but it's pretty much bulletproof from what I've read in a porsche book, pretty sure it's good for like 700whp on stock internals

the new higher displacement TT engine are less robust and more efficient
Old 04-25-2014, 12:28 PM
  #18  
kap
Registered User

 
kap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I was like "That's not a Cad... oh... LOL"

Old 04-25-2014, 02:58 PM
  #19  

 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,396
Received 427 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EastS2k
you actually made a really good call on the 07 vs 10.

I believe in 07 they still had the metzger engine, which is a full race engine block that they use in the race cars even today; granted it's less efficient - but it's pretty much bulletproof from what I've read in a porsche book, pretty sure it's good for like 700whp on stock internals

the new higher displacement TT engine are less robust and more efficient
The above is accurate except for the spelling. It's Mezger. . I'd take an 07-09 Turbo over the '10 as they went to a less robust engine in '10.
Old 04-29-2014, 10:20 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Slithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Beautiful car. Enjoy. Everyone that I know that has one, loves it.


Quick Reply: Massive conversion for my CTS-V!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 AM.