Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Leasing 2005 NSX vs. 2005 Corvette Vert.

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-22-2005, 11:40 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
brockLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dont lease cars
Old 06-22-2005, 11:49 AM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DJRobNM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Royal Oak
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brockLT1,Jun 22 2005, 02:40 PM
dont lease cars
Are you saying I shouldn't, or you don't? I've always leased cars, then bought my last two cars and now I kind of wish I had leased them since I want new ones. Its a matter of getting a good deal or not, because buying a car means you have put more money into an asset that depreciates quickly (with the exception of the s2000 apparently).
Old 06-22-2005, 12:02 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
blastr17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Valley Cottage, NY
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Leasing cars is the cheapest as long as you dont go over the miles..in most cases
Old 06-22-2005, 12:18 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Penforhire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: La Habra
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Geez, for $900 a month you don't need to lease! That's about the payment for five years on $50K for a low-interest loan. Go shop Z06's! By the end of the third year you wouldn't be upside down on the loan so you could trade or sell after that.
Old 06-22-2005, 12:19 PM
  #15  
Member (Premium)
 
vader1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: MAHT-O-MEDI
Posts: 11,857
Received 438 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blastr17,Jun 22 2005, 02:02 PM
Leasing cars is the cheapest as long as you dont go over the miles..in most cases
Gonna disagree with you on that one. Leasing turns out to be cheaper for most instances where the buyer swithces cars every three years or less. Buying tends to be cheaper in almost all cases when the buyer keeps the car more than three years. (if the negotiated selling price of the car were equal under buy vs. lease)

Depends on the terms of the least but it is a general rule of thumb that holds true in most cases.
Old 06-22-2005, 12:20 PM
  #16  
Registered User

 
Young_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 5,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I will take New 05 NSX lease deal rather than the C6...

now if i were to purchase between them...i would take C6.

if that make any sense.
Old 06-22-2005, 12:22 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
blastr17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Valley Cottage, NY
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vader1,Jun 22 2005, 12:19 PM
Gonna disagree with you on that one. Leasing turns out to be cheaper for most instances where the buyer swithces cars every three years or less. Buying tends to be cheaper in almost all cases when the buyer keeps the car more than three years. (if the negotiated selling price of the car were equal under buy vs. lease)

Depends on the terms of the least but it is a general rule of thumb that holds true in most cases.
Thats why i said in most cases and not all cases..of course if you finance and keep the car for 5+ years it pays to buy
Old 06-22-2005, 12:27 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
MattH25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ogden
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DJRobNM,Jun 22 2005, 09:47 AM
Why is it that I can lease a NSX with an MSRP of $89k for $850mth/12000/36 and a Corvette Convertible with an MSRP of $52k for $1000mth/12000/36???

Is the residual value on these Corvettes really that bad, or is GM just clamoring to make money?
Did you actually read the fine print for that offer? It's not 12k miles a year, it's 7500. The net cap cost is $80,943.42...not the full MSRP. If the Vette sold at a $9k discount and the lease was 7500 miles a year I'm sure it would be much cheaper also. Compare Apples to Apples buddy, not oranges.
Old 06-22-2005, 12:33 PM
  #19  

 
Scot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nashville
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

You can't beat the price of the NSX lease compared to other $90k cars....You would be hard pressed to find an M3 (stickers for $55k) for the same lease deal.

Of course the NSX is basically a 15 year old car with some minor improvements in 1997 and 2002, so it really isn't worth $90k at all.

I rarely see NSX's.... i see C6's a fair amount (mostly driven by old men who would be just as happy in a Pontiac Vibe).

NSX's still look awesome to me.....
Old 06-22-2005, 12:37 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
C6400hp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PsychoBen,Jun 22 2005, 11:34 AM
That, and one of those cars has horrible depreciation. I always say you can't judge a car's price by it sales price alone. Car ownership cost ultimately comes down to sales price minus resale price.
really, have you ever priced used corvettes? They're not cheap.


Quick Reply: Leasing 2005 NSX vs. 2005 Corvette Vert.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 AM.