Jeep SRT8 cherokee? 0-60 <5 seconds!
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island/C'ville, VA
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slithr,Apr 4 2005, 01:02 PM
Huh?
I thought you would have learned by now that trucks don't endanger the public, people endanger the public.
Happs22 - just because an SUV doesn't make sense for you doesn't mean it doesn't make sense for others. Don't project your needs/desires on me, I have enough trouble.
#23
Originally Posted by Slithr,Apr 4 2005, 10:02 AM
I thought you would have learned by now that trucks don't endanger the public, people endanger the public.
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brockLT1,Apr 3 2005, 11:12 AM
I cant wait to buy one and smoke you.
This Jeep is even more assanine when you consider what brand it comes from, and what they made their name on. Speed wasn't it.
#26
Thread Starter
Wow... what a bunch of pissed off people. I think it is neat that they are making these goofy fast trucks.
The ML55 has been out for years and you guys haven't bitched about those. Typhoon's are pretty neat (at least I think they are neat).
Knowing that these "suv's" will beat a 1966 GTO at just about everything is funny as hell.
My Wife's MDX gets 11-12 mpg the way she drives it from the house to the store, to the school to the house to the bank. If a 400hp jeep gets 10mpg instead of 11 who the hell cares. The MDX does get about 20mpg at 78mph on the highway..... which is probably not that much better than the 400hp jeep.
The ML55 has been out for years and you guys haven't bitched about those. Typhoon's are pretty neat (at least I think they are neat).
Knowing that these "suv's" will beat a 1966 GTO at just about everything is funny as hell.
My Wife's MDX gets 11-12 mpg the way she drives it from the house to the store, to the school to the house to the bank. If a 400hp jeep gets 10mpg instead of 11 who the hell cares. The MDX does get about 20mpg at 78mph on the highway..... which is probably not that much better than the 400hp jeep.
#27
Originally Posted by Scot,Apr 5 2005, 04:43 AM
Wow... what a bunch of pissed off people. I think it is neat that they are making these goofy fast trucks.
The ML55 has been out for years and you guys haven't bitched about those. Typhoon's are pretty neat (at least I think they are neat).
Knowing that these "suv's" will beat a 1966 GTO at just about everything is funny as hell.
My Wife's MDX gets 11-12 mpg the way she drives it from the house to the store, to the school to the house to the bank. If a 400hp jeep gets 10mpg instead of 11 who the hell cares. The MDX does get about 20mpg at 78mph on the highway..... which is probably not that much better than the 400hp jeep.
The ML55 has been out for years and you guys haven't bitched about those. Typhoon's are pretty neat (at least I think they are neat).
Knowing that these "suv's" will beat a 1966 GTO at just about everything is funny as hell.
My Wife's MDX gets 11-12 mpg the way she drives it from the house to the store, to the school to the house to the bank. If a 400hp jeep gets 10mpg instead of 11 who the hell cares. The MDX does get about 20mpg at 78mph on the highway..... which is probably not that much better than the 400hp jeep.
give the GTO some 105 octane, screw with the timing, and give it a nice pair of stick/wide tires.....and then we'll see what happens.
but i see your point
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't understand the attitude.
If you don't like it, don't buy it. It's as simple as that. There are many hideous things on the road right now that I would never consider buying. They don't bother me.
If it gets 5 miles per gallon and the gas is $4 a gallon, I don't see how that affects you. You don't own it, so you're not paying for the gas.
The only semi-valid argument against it is that it might be dangerous. Yeah, I kind of agree, a 5000 pound truck that's fast as hell could be dangerous in the wrong hands. A lead-footed soccer mom with a coffee in one hand and a cell phone in the other could do a LOT of damage with that thing.
If you don't like it, don't buy it. It's as simple as that. There are many hideous things on the road right now that I would never consider buying. They don't bother me.
If it gets 5 miles per gallon and the gas is $4 a gallon, I don't see how that affects you. You don't own it, so you're not paying for the gas.
The only semi-valid argument against it is that it might be dangerous. Yeah, I kind of agree, a 5000 pound truck that's fast as hell could be dangerous in the wrong hands. A lead-footed soccer mom with a coffee in one hand and a cell phone in the other could do a LOT of damage with that thing.
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My attitude had nothing to do with the truck necessarily, other than that I think it's lame and predictable, and I'll never buy it.
My second reply had to do with someone else's chide, to which I chided back.
As far as modern fast trucks beating a 1966 GTO...uh, I'd freakin hope they would, with 40 years of technological advances. But remember that the 1966 GTO wasn't intended as an end-all be-all track star. I like GTOs like anyone else, but other cars were better suited to that then, and would be more appropriate for comparison, even given their age.
My second reply had to do with someone else's chide, to which I chided back.
As far as modern fast trucks beating a 1966 GTO...uh, I'd freakin hope they would, with 40 years of technological advances. But remember that the 1966 GTO wasn't intended as an end-all be-all track star. I like GTOs like anyone else, but other cars were better suited to that then, and would be more appropriate for comparison, even given their age.