Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Jeep SRT8 cherokee? 0-60 <5 seconds!

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-02-2005, 03:13 PM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
Scot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nashville
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 16 Posts
Default Jeep SRT8 cherokee? 0-60 <5 seconds!

hahaha.. I love power wars..... between this and the new SS Trailblazer (corvette engine) they both move!!!

Grand Cherokee SRT8 Most Powerful Jeep Ever
Powered by a 415-horsepower 6.1-liter HEMI V8, the Grand Cherokee SRT8 is the quickest Jeep ever produced, capable of accelerating from zero to 60 mph in under 5 seconds.

The first Jeep to receive performance upgrades from Chrysler's Street and Racing Technology (SRT) team, the Grand Cherokee SRT8 includes a specially developed all-wheel-drive system.

In addition to the HEMI, the Grand Cherokee SRT8 gets optimized for balanced performance with SRT-tuned shocks, unique sway bars, special spring rates, and revised suspension bushings. The ride height of the Grand Cherokee SRT8 is one inch lower than the Grand Cherokee, which adds to the aggressive stance and actually reduces aerodynamic drag.

"Jeep vehicles lead the way in performance and versatility," said Jeff Bell, vice president of Jeep in the Chrysler Group. "The all-new 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 adds a new dimension to performance and versatility
Old 04-02-2005, 09:47 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Slamnasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Predictable and lame IMO. Gas can't be burned quick enough apparently.

Pretty soon everyone will have 400hp and then such things will be boring. I'd still much rather have a car with 400hp than a top-heavy truck, lowered or otherwise.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:07 AM
  #3  
Registered User

 
climacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From this angle it looks like the driver-side front wheel fell off.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:10 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
happs22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island/C'ville, VA
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slamnasty,Apr 3 2005, 01:47 AM
Predictable and lame IMO. Gas can't be burned quick enough apparently.

Pretty soon everyone will have 400hp and then such things will be boring. I'd still much rather have a car with 400hp than a top-heavy truck, lowered or otherwise.
As if owning an SUV isn't ridiculous enough in itself (if you want room and versatility, why not buy a wagon/minivan?), now we have 5000 lb vehicles that can accelerate that fast? I pity the sportscar/sedan driver who's broadsided by the soccer mom driving that thing.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:12 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
brockLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slamnasty,Apr 2 2005, 10:47 PM
Predictable and lame IMO. Gas can't be burned quick enough apparently.

Pretty soon everyone will have 400hp and then such things will be boring. I'd still much rather have a car with 400hp than a top-heavy truck, lowered or otherwise.
I cant wait to buy one and smoke you.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:38 AM
  #6  
Registered User

 
PilotKD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

$4.00 a gallon, here we come. This country is going backwards in automotive engineering.
Old 04-03-2005, 11:47 AM
  #7  

Thread Starter
 
Scot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nashville
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PilotKD,Apr 3 2005, 02:38 PM
$4.00 a gallon, here we come. This country is going backwards in automotive engineering.
i doubt this thing gets any worse mileage than a viper, new mustang shelby, lambo's, ferrari's, etc.....
Old 04-03-2005, 01:13 PM
  #8  
Registered User

 
BPUKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by happs22,Apr 3 2005, 11:10 AM
As if owning an SUV isn't ridiculous enough in itself (if you want room and versatility, why not buy a wagon/minivan?), now we have 5000 lb vehicles that can accelerate that fast? I pity the sportscar/sedan driver who's broadsided by the soccer mom driving that thing.
Some SUV's make sense. I have a daughter and my RX 330 does the job very well. I'll be damned if I ever have a minivan. On top of all that I average 21-23mpg per tank of gas. My 330i doesn't even get those numbers.

Back to the Jeep...I can't see the reasoning behind these gas guzzling SRT cars. The 300 C SRT, Charger SRT, and this all have gas guzzler status. I guess people think gas is going to go back down one day? Do they read the news paper? I guess global economics and politics fly right over their heads.

Sam
Old 04-03-2005, 02:53 PM
  #9  

 
LUV2REV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,420
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brockLT1,Apr 3 2005, 12:12 PM
I cant wait to buy one and smoke you.
And your point is.... What a lame remark.
Old 04-03-2005, 04:08 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As if owning an SUV isn't ridiculous enough in itself (if you want room and versatility, why not buy a wagon/minivan?),
I love that argument. Obviously you have zero experience with kid seats.

Calling SUV's dumb because of their fuel consumption while driving a car that can only carry two people and gets worse gas mileage than some SUV's is just ing stupid.


Quick Reply: Jeep SRT8 cherokee? 0-60 <5 seconds!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 PM.