Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Ish. New Accord

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-20-2017, 07:54 AM
  #11  
Registered User

 
RedCelica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 15,344
Received 95 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Wonder how hard a 2.0T swap would be into my TSX when the K24 gives up the ghost

Anyone know the engine codes for these new turbo motors? Looking at parts catalog there's something listed as "KA"
Old 07-20-2017, 07:56 AM
  #12  

 
white98ls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,137
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

I like it quite a bit, esp. the fact that you can get a Sport 6MT with either engine. Although I am a bit perplexed as to why the 2.0 HP rating is so low (252) compared to the Camry (301) and Civic Type R (306). Sure they detuned it for more low-midrange, mpg and regular fuel, but that's an enormous drop. Will be especially dumb if it turns out to be 20-30hp underrated and they could have claimed a much closer number to the Camry.
Old 07-20-2017, 08:36 AM
  #13  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedCelica
Wonder how hard a 2.0T swap would be into my TSX when the K24 gives up the ghost

Anyone know the engine codes for these new turbo motors? Looking at parts catalog there's something listed as "KA"
K20C1 for the CTR.
The following users liked this post:
RedCelica (07-20-2017)
Old 07-20-2017, 08:44 AM
  #14  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,431
Received 281 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

I'm not a fan. The front end is overwrought, much like every single design that comes out of Honda these days. The way the leading edge of the hood sticks out, like a big forehead, just looks horrible. And if you're gonna design it to look like a hatchback, then make it a hatchback! At least it looks better than the Civic, though admittedly that was an easy hurdle to clear.

Detuning the 2.0T engine for Accord duty makes little sense to me, given the size of the car it's not like people would pick it over the CTR because they have same power levels. 252 is pretty weak for the segment. A 252hp version of this engine is what SHOULD have been the engine for the Civic Si. The 300+ hp V6 Camry version would seem like the go-to enthusiast choice for the segment, but it's glaringly missing a manual transmission option and probably doesn't have an LSD. (what was all the fuss about Toyota trying to be more sporty again....seems like lip service here)
Old 07-20-2017, 03:56 PM
  #15  
Member (Premium)
Thread Starter
 
vader1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: MAHT-O-MEDI
Posts: 11,857
Received 438 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy
Did you even try to get some more views? Here are some "good" photos. I think it's quite handsome, overall, especially in that grey (or darker) colors.
Well, the photos you posted don't do it for me either. Its just a personal taste thing. I did not like the Civic when it came out but it is growing on me a little. This is kind of the same general design of the Civic sedan but it is stretched and big looking and not in a good way.

I agree with one of the previous posts that the current car was near perfect. It could have been slightly sportier looking but to me anyway, the design goes backwards. But hey, its Honda. They like to be quirky.
Old 07-21-2017, 06:13 AM
  #16  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,431
Received 281 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

I thought the current Accord was handsome looking before it received the "bling" treatment last year with all that stupid chrome.
Old 07-21-2017, 06:27 AM
  #17  

 
billios996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 1,282
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Revenge of the CrossTour and Acura beak. Honda is intent on making some goofy designs. They are really hanging on to that chrome bar across the grille.
Old 07-21-2017, 06:52 AM
  #18  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k
I thought the current Accord was handsome looking before it received the "bling" treatment last year with all that stupid chrome.
Agreed. My mom has a 2014, pre-MMC Accord and I think it looks a lot classier than the post-MMC Accord.
Old 07-21-2017, 08:55 AM
  #19  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,431
Received 281 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

Let's not forget the mid-generation refresh also included upsizing the wheels 1 inch across the board. Because Bling, that's why.
Old 07-21-2017, 09:53 AM
  #20  

 
Hakkaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 672
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k
Let's not forget the mid-generation refresh also included upsizing the wheels 1 inch across the board. Because Bling, that's why.
I actually really like the sport/touring rims, especially with the side skirts on those trim?



Quick Reply: Ish. New Accord



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:33 AM.