Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

And I thought BMW couldn't make it look any uglier...

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-11-2011, 01:52 PM
  #51  

 
s.hasan546's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,160
Received 113 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hirev
in 2003 I offered a dealer 57,000 for a new m3 cab without nav. they told me to take a hike...i bought my 04 S2000 for $31500 and a slightly used 04 tl for $27,000....now that same m3 cab is worth maybe $21,000 and my s2000 is worth maybe
$16,000 and my tl maybe $14,000. My point, two cars cost what one costs and are worth more when very used.

Take at look at the lease return bmw's, after 4 years they are worth maybe $25,000 plus or min....335i sedans....cost new $45,000. That's a real hit in 4 years and the mercs are worse....point being that these little overpriced ugly cars that drive well and wear the roundel have poor resale, so wait till they are a few years old for yours.
Your comparing a totally different model run though. 2007 bmw M3s in decent condition still sell for a good amount. Coupes with MSRPs of 65k in 2007 still are worth at least $40k. 38% depreciation or a 62% residual over 4 years is pretty damn good. Now when the next generation m3s come out obviously these will depreciate a whole lot more. btw your estimation of a 4 year old 3 series of costing $50000 new and $25000 in 4 years is only 50% residual/depreciation. Thats a decent residual. Most cars run in the 45-58%. Also s2000s are a special scenario. After the stopped building them they have appreciated from all the prices ive seen.

At the end of the way buying any high end car has multiple costs. Its not just about monthly cost, insurance, and maintenance. You gotta include depreciation. If you can't afford that than well you shouldn't be looking at those cars in the first place. But for $40k ill take a 3 series and that extra depreciation over anything from honda, toyota, hyundia; etc. All the "luxury" brands are gonna have higher costs. However, most people looking into these cars don't care.
Old 06-11-2011, 04:23 PM
  #52  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s.hasan546
Your comparing a totally different model run though. 2007 bmw M3s in decent condition still sell for a good amount. Coupes with MSRPs of 65k in 2007 still are worth at least $40k. 38% depreciation or a 62% residual over 4 years is pretty damn good. Now when the next generation m3s come out obviously these will depreciate a whole lot more. btw your estimation of a 4 year old 3 series of costing $50000 new and $25000 in 4 years is only 50% residual/depreciation. Thats a decent residual. Most cars run in the 45-58%. Also s2000s are a special scenario. After the stopped building them they have appreciated from all the prices ive seen.

At the end of the way buying any high end car has multiple costs. Its not just about monthly cost, insurance, and maintenance. You gotta include depreciation. If you can't afford that than well you shouldn't be looking at those cars in the first place. But for $40k ill take a 3 series and that extra depreciation over anything from honda, toyota, hyundia; etc. All the "luxury" brands are gonna have higher costs. However, most people looking into these cars don't care.
BMW didn't make a 2007 M3. They stopped in 2006 with the E46 and picked up in 2008 with the E90/92 M3. 2008s are available for $40K though most are $42K or more, which is a 35-38% depreciation in 3 years, not 4.
Old 06-11-2011, 04:56 PM
  #53  

 
RC 94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy
Originally Posted by s.hasan546' timestamp='1307829129' post='20672954
Your comparing a totally different model run though. 2007 bmw M3s in decent condition still sell for a good amount. Coupes with MSRPs of 65k in 2007 still are worth at least $40k. 38% depreciation or a 62% residual over 4 years is pretty damn good. Now when the next generation m3s come out obviously these will depreciate a whole lot more. btw your estimation of a 4 year old 3 series of costing $50000 new and $25000 in 4 years is only 50% residual/depreciation. Thats a decent residual. Most cars run in the 45-58%. Also s2000s are a special scenario. After the stopped building them they have appreciated from all the prices ive seen.

At the end of the way buying any high end car has multiple costs. Its not just about monthly cost, insurance, and maintenance. You gotta include depreciation. If you can't afford that than well you shouldn't be looking at those cars in the first place. But for $40k ill take a 3 series and that extra depreciation over anything from honda, toyota, hyundia; etc. All the "luxury" brands are gonna have higher costs. However, most people looking into these cars don't care.
BMW didn't make a 2007 M3. They stopped in 2006 with the E46 and picked up in 2008 with the E90/92 M3. 2008s are available for $40K though most are $42K or more, which is a 35-38% depreciation in 3 years, not 4.
Didn't you buy the 2008 M3 in 2007 though? I've never understood a lot of the depreciation calculation using the actual year and then the model year because 90% of the time the car was bought the year before the actual model year.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
archtop
Car and Bike Talk
16
10-23-2007 06:11 PM
Saki GT
Car and Bike Talk
45
10-02-2007 08:08 AM
rustywave
Car and Bike Talk
19
08-02-2006 08:00 AM
GradStudent
Car and Bike Talk
26
07-22-2004 07:21 AM
wantone
The S2000 Gallery
45
12-08-2002 08:24 PM



Quick Reply: And I thought BMW couldn't make it look any uglier...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:09 PM.