The Honda Ridgeline will start at $27,700
#81
Registered User
Originally Posted by S2kRob' date='Feb 5 2005, 07:59 PM
Conversely i have seen a BMW 7 series haul an E34 M5 around all day on a dual axle trailer better than most 1/2 ton trucks will.
Rated tow capacity of a 7 series = 0 lbs.
Rated tow capacity of a 7 series = 0 lbs.
it's an E38 7-series.
i can't speak to rob's comment "pulls like a champ" as i've never been in the 7 series, but the track in question is 2+ hours from the greater toronto area (where i presume willz lives) and he does this all the time.
i've passed him once on the way to the track - or was it back from the track?
#83
Registered User
Originally Posted by b0mbrman' date='Feb 6 2005, 10:28 PM
Paging esracer
Where do you see nicely-equipped Titans being sold for $18,000?
Where do you see nicely-equipped Titans being sold for $18,000?
#86
I don't think it's a good looking vehicle but neither is the Accord or Civic. But I'd gladly buy either one of those as a new car (if needed). I've got a last generation Accord - it's not ugly but it isn't exactly pretty, either. Execution is, in many cases, more important than looks. I'd take the Ridgeline over an F-150 in my current situation. It just makes more sense.
I guess the Ridgeline will cater to "responsible" or "logical" buyers (or else Honda-only buyers, though some would argue they are one and the same) rather than "macho" or "I have to look good" or "I need to tow my house" buyers.
I guess the Ridgeline will cater to "responsible" or "logical" buyers (or else Honda-only buyers, though some would argue they are one and the same) rather than "macho" or "I have to look good" or "I need to tow my house" buyers.
#87
Registered User
Originally Posted by JonBoy' date='Feb 7 2005, 09:33 PM
I don't think it's a good looking vehicle but neither is the Accord or Civic. But I'd gladly buy either one of those as a new car (if needed). I've got a last generation Accord - it's not ugly but it isn't exactly pretty, either. Execution is, in many cases, more important than looks. I'd take the Ridgeline over an F-150 in my current situation. It just makes more sense.
I guess the Ridgeline will cater to "responsible" or "logical" buyers (or else Honda-only buyers, though some would argue they are one and the same) rather than "macho" or "I have to look good" or "I need to tow my house" buyers.
I guess the Ridgeline will cater to "responsible" or "logical" buyers (or else Honda-only buyers, though some would argue they are one and the same) rather than "macho" or "I have to look good" or "I need to tow my house" buyers.
#88
I'd take an F150 if I was towing a LARGE boat, for sure (and if I was doing it regularly). However, I would not buy an F150 if I was towing that boat once a month. It's ridiculous (in my opinion) to sacrifice everything in the name of towing when you only do it 3% of the time...which is why I said, in my situation right now, I'd buy a Ridgeline over an F150 (or any other half ton).
#89
Registered User
I think the idea of driving a truck every day is pretty silly. OF course there are exceptions like if you work in construction or something. A truck is for doing work. They are big, get bad mileage, are heavy and are unsafe for people around you. The honda is no different compared to accords, civics etc. If I needed a truck I wouldn't get a new truck and I would use it when I needed it.
#90
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA.WA.[TX].VA
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by s2kpdx01' date='Feb 7 2005, 02:56 PM
I think the idea of driving a truck every day is pretty silly. OF course there are exceptions like if you work in construction or something. A truck is for doing work. They are big, get bad mileage, are heavy and are unsafe for people around you. The honda is no different compared to accords, civics etc. If I needed a truck I wouldn't get a new truck and I would use it when I needed it.