The Honda Ridgeline will start at $27,700
#111
Registered User
Originally Posted by b0mbrman' date='Feb 8 2005, 04:37 PM
I think the dumbest thing I've ever read is people who insist on using their S2000 as a daily driver, regardless of what rain, snow, salted roads, or 10 mph bumper-to-bumper traffic, is out there.
LOL - that's the problem....you see it as some magnificent "roadster"....
dude, it's just a car.....a cheap $30K car at that....that's a commuter-car price point in canada....
#112
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA.WA.[TX].VA
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by koala' date='Feb 8 2005, 09:00 AM
Yeah but the Mazda B series / Ford Ranger isn't much of a truck
But it's up to you what's a bigger misallocation from a weekday driver--all that wasted horsepower putting miles, wear, and tear, on a roadster in traffic, or the sometimes-wasted space driving a pickup to work.
#113
The S get's better milage than a WRX which has less power. Think about it.
What was your point again?
#114
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA.WA.[TX].VA
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PLYRS 3' date='Feb 8 2005, 01:14 PM
LOL - that's the problem....you see it as some magnificent "roadster"....
dude, it's just a car.....a cheap $30K car at that....that's a commuter-car price point in canada....
Just makes sense money-wise but if you've got plenty to throw around, go for it
And feel free to send me some
[Edit] Playing with the numbers on KBB.com, if I were to add 10k miles to my S2000, its private party value would go down by $1430. And, according to KBB.com, how much would my beater depreciate if I added 10k miles to the odo?
$75
#115
Originally Posted by s2kpdx01' date='Feb 8 2005, 02:55 PM
The ridgeline will do nothing very well and costs a lot....27k for an SUV with the back cutt off is a lot...sort of reminds me of the whole del sol idea.....
But that's nothing, I guess....?
#116
Registered User
Originally Posted by jlucas' date='Feb 7 2005, 06:39 PM
He said truck.
#117
Registered User
Originally Posted by b0mbrman' date='Feb 8 2005, 05:21 PM
Again, it's your money, but I'd rather put the miles and door dings of daily driving, etc. on my $4,000 '95 Prelude that wouldn't elicit a tear out of me were I to drive it over a cliff, than on a $30,000 S2000.
Just makes sense money-wise but if you've got plenty to throw around, go for it
And feel free to send me some
[Edit] Playing with the numbers on KBB.com, if I were to add 10k miles to my S2000, its private party value would go down by $1430. And, according to KBB.com, how much would my beater depreciate if I added 10k miles to the odo?
$75
Just makes sense money-wise but if you've got plenty to throw around, go for it
And feel free to send me some
[Edit] Playing with the numbers on KBB.com, if I were to add 10k miles to my S2000, its private party value would go down by $1430. And, according to KBB.com, how much would my beater depreciate if I added 10k miles to the odo?
$75
but let's look at your example:
the S2000 would depreciate by 1,430 for an additional 10K driven.
what's it costing you to insure your S2000 even though you're not driving it? (i presume you would at least keep theft coverage if it's stored).
what's it costing you to insure your beater?
does an additional 10K on your "old" beater yield higher maintenance costs than by putting 10K on your "newer" S2000? if so, how much?
you need to keep 2 vehicles registered....what are the registration costs of 2 cars vs. 1 car?
if you have payments (lease/loan) remaining on the S2000, you have to make those regardless of whether or not you drive the car.
bomber, there's a lot of shit that can easily out-weigh the $1430...and then some.
#118
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA.WA.[TX].VA
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote name='PLYRS 3' date='Feb 8 2005, 02:06 PM'] i don't dispute that mileage accelerates depreciation.
but let's look at your example:
the S2000 would depreciate by 1,430 for an additional 10K driven.
what's it costing you to insure your S2000 even though you're not driving it? (i presume you would at least keep theft coverage if it's stored).
what's it costing you to insure your beater?
does an additional 10K on your "old" beater yield higher maintenance costs than by putting 10K on your "newer" S2000?
but let's look at your example:
the S2000 would depreciate by 1,430 for an additional 10K driven.
what's it costing you to insure your S2000 even though you're not driving it? (i presume you would at least keep theft coverage if it's stored).
what's it costing you to insure your beater?
does an additional 10K on your "old" beater yield higher maintenance costs than by putting 10K on your "newer" S2000?
#119
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Jose
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by steve c' date='Feb 8 2005, 01:18 PM
And worse gas mileage than the Corvette and 350Z, both of which have more horsepower and more cylinders. "Think about it."
What was your point again?
What was your point again?
This is the first and last time I will respond to you. Some times you know what your talking about, and some times you don't. But at all times you're just an a$$-hole, and I have no time for people like you.
Keep on trolling.
#120
My S2000 gets better gas mileage than my Tundra, but factor in premium fuel vs. reg. U/L, Mobil 1 vs. dino oil, and tire costs (I'll leave ins. premiums out of the equation since that's a fixed cost), and the S2000 is clearly more expensive to drive. It's also a LEV, and as for the comment about being safe for other people, I think the better solution is not to hit other people...something S2000 drivers obviously do more frequently than average, based on my ever-rising ins. premiums.
It's amusing how many people are predicting the Ridgeline's failure b/c it doesn't meet their needs. Remember, they're only looking to sell 50K per year, vs. the hundreds of thousands annually that each of the big 3 sell. That's a drop in the bucket, and all it needs to do is fill a small niche of the market to meet sales targets.
It's amusing how many people are predicting the Ridgeline's failure b/c it doesn't meet their needs. Remember, they're only looking to sell 50K per year, vs. the hundreds of thousands annually that each of the big 3 sell. That's a drop in the bucket, and all it needs to do is fill a small niche of the market to meet sales targets.