curiouz_G

1st and last Honda for me. I'm tired of defending a car company that is going AWAY from what made them what they are today.

Saint_Spinner

Wait...so you're saying that the S2000 and NSX is what made Honda what it is today? IMO, I think Honda is going BACK to what theyre good at. They're going back to their roots. Good, dependable, economic cars.

When I think Honda, I think Civic, Accord and motorbikes. I don't think: S2000 or NSX. The sports cars were never profitable for Honda. Again, I don't see what the hub-bub is..It seems that a lot of people became Honda fans AFTER the release of the S2000, and ONLY because of the S2000. I've had an old civic hatch, a prelude, an S2000, NSX and now a plain jane civic. I still think they make good cars, despite that, I'm not a Honda loyalist. If honda doesn't offer a sports car, so what? Go buy another sports car from a different company. No biggie.

So basicaly, since they released 2 sports cars, it automaticaly makes them an exciting car company? And without an S2000 or NSX, all of a sudden its a crappy company?

starchland

I think of civic. if you can garnish the mass apeal the civic has, that is a great car. my grandma and my 17 year old ricer both want the same car to drive.

Saint_Spinner

See what I mean?

Update:http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/26/r...er-lighter-ne/

Steponme

Some of you seem to think Honda was Ferrari or Porsche or something. Honda is, first and foremost, a mainstream automaker. Profitability is their foremost concern; changing with the economic times is their duty to their stockholders.