Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Honda comments on mileage

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-24-2005 | 05:13 AM
  #1  
cdelena's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default Honda comments on mileage

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8272373/site/newsweek/


We don't spend a lot of time agonizing about fuel consumption. The answer is already clear. You are going to have the best fuel economy in class of any vehicle. Period. Have a nice day. You don't need to do any market research. You don't need to do any fancy negotiations because you are never going to get anything approved by the board of directors without proving you have the best fuel economy in class. That's it.
Old 06-24-2005 | 05:57 AM
  #2  
Christople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 0
From: Corn Country
Default

When they (honda) designed the S2000, what was the most green thing about it? It doesn't get great gas milage compared to the boxster/z3. I know it meets emissions standards, but I guess they take a lighter approach when it comes to a sportier car.
Old 06-24-2005 | 07:44 AM
  #3  
WhiteS2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

I like this question/answer:
Honda leads the car business in fuel economy, but not in perception. Why is Toyota viewed as the greenest automaker?
That's very frustrating for us. Honda's head and shoulders the greenest company, yet other companies with less accomplishments are able to capitalize because they've got a better PR machine.
Wake up, Honda. Time to get a better PR machine.
Old 06-24-2005 | 08:05 AM
  #4  
lyndon_h's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Christople,Jun 24 2005, 07:57 AM
When they (honda) designed the S2000, what was the most green thing about it? It doesn't get great gas milage compared to the boxster/z3. I know it meets emissions standards, but I guess they take a lighter approach when it comes to a sportier car.
If I remember correctly. The s is actually a low emissions vehicle (not sure about that though). but the Vette gets better gas milage
Old 06-24-2005 | 08:56 AM
  #5  
turbo_pwr's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,831
Likes: 2
From: Paradise Valley, AZ miss NYC
Default

probably depends on how you drive it. I am sure if you never went into vtec and shifted conservatively you could get 30mpg.
Old 06-24-2005 | 09:04 AM
  #6  
pantyraider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 1
From: San Fran
Default

The S is an LEV vehicle, and it gets respectable gas mileage...the corvette gets better gas mileage mainly because of that ridiculou skip shift "feature"
Old 06-24-2005 | 09:09 AM
  #7  
QUIKAG's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,399
Likes: 434
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by pantyraider,Jun 24 2005, 09:04 AM
The S is an LEV vehicle, and it gets respectable gas mileage...the corvette gets better gas mileage mainly because of that ridiculou skip shift "feature"
The new LS2 is a ULEV-II motor and gets better gas mileage than the S2000. What an awesome motor. I love my F22, but the LSx motors really get the job done in so many areas.

The skip shift feature can be bypassed for a few bucks and 5 minutes of work. Fuel economy for both the Vette and S2000 is based on your driving style, but what I like about the Vette is that it CAN go faster and it CAN get better gas mileage depending on your mood. Best of both worlds.

All that said, Honda cars do get great fuel economy typically. I still like the lean burn Civic HX the best.
Old 06-24-2005 | 10:46 AM
  #8  
Lice Locket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 1
Default

IMO, the Acura RL has a pretty good example of a good, clean, Honda engine:

Horsepower (SAE net)
300 bhp @ 6200 rpm

Torque
260 lbs-ft @ 5000 rpm

Emissions
ULEV-2

EPA mileage
18/26 mpg

People look at "green-ness" by the fuel economy, but its actually the emissions (the MT Insight gets better mileage, but the CVT burns much cleaner). Supposedly, the new Civic SiR is also a ULEV, which differentiates itself from the RSX-S and other 200 hp compacts. Anyhoo, I'm glad Honda still cares about the environment, even though consumers don't.
Old 06-24-2005 | 10:58 AM
  #9  
mbilderback's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Default

A BMW exec tugged on his leg, asking, "Can I help you, sir?'' Baker's response: "Not unless you have a jack.''
Old 06-24-2005 | 12:03 PM
  #10  
cdelena's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

Yes, the S2000 is rated LEV but is hampered as far as mileage by modest torque production at low rpm requiring low gearing.. and that's what burns the fuel.. (a 2 liter at 5000rpm is sweeping the same volume as a 6 liter at 1700 rpm).

The low rpm torque production of the large Vette engine means you can lumber along on the highway at low rpm. A pass can be made without running up the rpm too much while with the S2000 it is easy (and fun) to drop to third and hit 9000 rpm a couple of times that destroys gas mileage.

Just drive the S2000 in higher gears to get decent mileage.. I have had some highway tanks over 30 mpg, and there are lots of disciplined drivers that have had extended trips with mileage approaching 35.

The S2000 was a model to celebrate Honda's 50th and show off technology and provides amazing performace with low displacement. I think it was close to meeting the best in class mileage goal.


Quick Reply: Honda comments on mileage



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 AM.