Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

HONDA CANCELS NEW NSX!

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-17-2008, 12:30 PM
  #61  
Registered User
 
Slamnasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Dec 17 2008, 12:52 PM
Well, Nissan has pretty much had a sports car in its line up for the past 50 years. Honda, only 10, since the S2000 is the only badged sports car here in the States - you can say 20 if you count the NSX as a Honda.

Nissan's Z has a long history here in the States:
240
260
280
300
300 gen2
350
now 370

Nissan has a long history of sports cars besides the Z cars, and having owned a Z, I can say it was just as reliable as my S, all things considered. Nissan is also big into motorsports in Japan - more so than Honda, which concentrated more on F1 only. To say Honda is the most motorsport oriented doesn't really say much about whether or not it made good sports cars.

Honda isn't really a company that does sports cars. It does econo cars, and that's its bread and butter. Shigeru Uehara was responsible for the NSX and S2000, and he's gone from Honda now. I suspect there are no more Shigeru Ueharas in Honda, so no more sports cars from Honda.

Honda canceling the NSX replacement isn't a shock to me, its been on and off the books for years now. Its never been as serious as Toyota or Nissan when it comes to sports cars, and that's the culture we're seeing now. Honda is an engine company and it wants to build efficient engines and put those in cars, not necessarily powerful engines in sports cars.
I think you could also make a case when you factor in the 200/240SX. Nissan had a second rear driver when nearly everyone else had one. The Prelude was always FWD, the Celica went FWD in the mid-80s while the Supra went upmarket, th DSMs were FWD out of the box and the 3000GT/Stealth was FWD as a base model, and Subaru had nothing in that segment (aside from being pure AWD). Only Mazda had the RWD Miata and RX-7. Nissan's cars had more power though.
Old 12-17-2008, 12:41 PM
  #62  
Moderator
Moderator
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,992
Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Yes, the 240SX, the Skylines that were Japan only, not to mention all the hopped up fwd cars. On the Z alone though, Nissan shows a strong history as being a sports car maker.
Old 12-17-2008, 01:02 PM
  #63  
Registered User

 
senor_flojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: All up in your inner tubes. Whatcha gonna do sucka?
Posts: 11,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looks like you bought from the wrong manufacturer, then....
Old 12-17-2008, 01:07 PM
  #64  
Registered User
 
nfty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Dec 17 2008, 02:52 PM
....Honda, only 10, since the S2000 is the only badged sports car here in the States - you can say 20 if you count the NSX as a Honda.....
Wait a minute, Honda makes cars and brands. Acura is merely a brand for Honda. Therefore NSX = Honda.

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Dec 17 2008, 02:52 PM
Nissan has a long history of sports cars besides the Z cars, and having owned a Z, I can say it was just as reliable as my S, all things considered.
All things considered, JD Power & Associates sez:

Honda > Nissan. Period no individual anecdotes, just studies across hundreds if not thousands of owners.

[QUOTE=Saki GT,Dec 17 2008, 02:52 PM][B]Nissan is also big into motorsports in Japan - more so than Honda, which concentrated more on F1 only.
Old 12-17-2008, 01:10 PM
  #65  
Registered User
 
nfty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Dec 17 2008, 03:41 PM
Yes, the 240SX, the Skylines that were Japan only, not to mention all the hopped up fwd cars. On the Z alone though, Nissan shows a strong history as being a sports car maker.
Hopped up FWD cars are not sports cars, and if we're talking "hot hatch" or similar sporty cars...

Honda > Nissan (again)

Please don't misunderstand me, I like Nissans (but the pre-Renault Nissan) and Princes. And have owned 4 over the years and can tell you that the Hondas I've owned (also 4 over the years, currently still own 2) pwn all over them.
Old 12-17-2008, 01:12 PM
  #66  
Moderator
Moderator
 
Saki GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Queen City, NC
Posts: 35,992
Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

You're making pointless points - if you want reliability, buy an Accord - we're talking sports cars and the culture of the company.

End of the day today:

Honda sports cars:

S2000

Nissan sports cars:

GT-R
370Z
G37 coupe


If you go back 50 years, you can count all Honda's sports cars on one hand. Honda is not a sports car company. The fact that it canned the NSX replacement kind of proves that.
Old 12-17-2008, 01:18 PM
  #67  
Registered User
 
nfty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^^ The G37 coupe and the GT-R are GT cars. They have back seats.

Therefore:

Honda: S2000
Nissan: 370Z
Old 12-17-2008, 01:20 PM
  #68  
Registered User
 
nfty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Saki:

Are you a Nissan fan, trapped in a Honda owner's body? LOL!
Old 12-17-2008, 01:22 PM
  #69  
Registered User

 
senor_flojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: All up in your inner tubes. Whatcha gonna do sucka?
Posts: 11,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah, he's moderating for the wrong forum.
Old 12-17-2008, 01:24 PM
  #70  
Registered User
 
yellow2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: houston
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i wonder how far really they were bring to market


Quick Reply: HONDA CANCELS NEW NSX!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 PM.