GM does their homework
#41
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by sw05s2k,Feb 21 2006, 02:28 PM
I don't think my intelligence is in question...
The reality is you currently don't own a domestic, yet you tell everyone to give them a shot?
The reality is you currently don't own a domestic, yet you tell everyone to give them a shot?
Reality is dictated by many factors, including one's own perception of what exactly is reality? Is Santa Claus real? Just because you can't touch something or don't currently own something doesn't mean that you don't have strong feelings toward or against it.
I believe in many of GM's products, just as I think Honda and Toyota put out good products. I just feel that many people discount GM too much and put too much faith in foreign products. I am objective in my assessment of what to buy, sometimes I buy American, sometimes I buy foreign.
#42
Site Moderator
Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Feb 21 2006, 02:35 PM
I believe in many of GM's products, just as I think Honda and Toyota put out good products. I just feel that many people discount GM too much and put too much faith in foreign products. I am objective in my assessment of what to buy, sometimes I buy American, sometimes I buy foreign.
#43
good article there sir! very interesting!
not only is GM betting on fuel cells, but more importantly, ethanol! i think betting on ethanol of the short term is the right idea (it costs some cars 300$ to convert to ethanol which pays for itself in good time and most cars can be converted), but also researching fuel cell technology for the long run.
a good read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel
my bet is GM will come out on top with its R&D related to ethanol. just look for the yellow gas caps.
not only is GM betting on fuel cells, but more importantly, ethanol! i think betting on ethanol of the short term is the right idea (it costs some cars 300$ to convert to ethanol which pays for itself in good time and most cars can be converted), but also researching fuel cell technology for the long run.
a good read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel
my bet is GM will come out on top with its R&D related to ethanol. just look for the yellow gas caps.
#44
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
11 Posts
Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Feb 21 2006, 02:14 PM
I agree, but market and geopolitical forces had as great a hand as the Big 3's complacency on their current situation.
PS, yeah, sorry, I misspelled one word. That qualifies me for MENSA candidacy around here.
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Feb 21 2006, 01:15 PM
Cost inputs are less for the Japanese makes and even lesser for the Korean and soon-to-be Chinese makes over their domestic counterpart.
#46
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
11 Posts
Originally Posted by WhiteS2k,Feb 21 2006, 03:53 PM
I am not an accountant, but this is an interesting observation, and I wonder why that is the case. In today's global economy, if the domestics and Japanese (and some Koreans too) are all building their cars in the same countries, why does it cost less for the Japanese? And if the Japanese (and Korean and Chinese) can do it, why can't the domestics do the same as far as cost is concerned?
#48
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by sw05s2k,Feb 21 2006, 02:53 PM
I'll agree with you on that one. I just wish the fit and finish of the domestics was better, mainly on the interior.
The new Impala, C6, STS, etc. show that GM is trying to put some money back into interior fit, finish, material quality, etc.
#49
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Chris Stack,Feb 21 2006, 03:13 PM
What were the geopolitical forces that affected GM, aside from the Oil Crisis (which should have come as no surprise to GM, since already small, fuel efficient cars like the Beetle were already pretty popular)? I mean, you say "market forces" but isn't it the Big Three's job to read the market and see where it's going, instead of just producing what they think people should buy? It wasn't just fuel efficiency that started the big three's downward slide. IMO, they have no one but themselves to blame.
PS, yeah, sorry, I misspelled one word. That qualifies me for MENSA candidacy around here.
PS, yeah, sorry, I misspelled one word. That qualifies me for MENSA candidacy around here.
Foreign government subsidies, labor and material inputs, copying and improving all favored foreign makes at the expense of domestic market share. The aforementioned oil crisis allowed the foreign makes a foot hold and they capitalized on their success from that point forward. It's a sad story and I'm sure it makes for more than one case study at MBA schools around the country.
You can blame the Big 3 for not reading the market or believing that they could dictate what the consumer could or would buy, but you'd be selling yourself short without looking at the whole picture.
#50
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canton
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=QUIKAG,Feb 21 2006, 03:01 PM] Last time I checked, people were brainwashed into buying theoretically superior quality products from overseas filling the coffers of foreign corporations and wreaking havoc on the trade deficit.