Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

GM does their homework

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-21-2006, 01:35 PM
  #41  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,396
Received 427 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sw05s2k,Feb 21 2006, 02:28 PM
I don't think my intelligence is in question...

The reality is you currently don't own a domestic, yet you tell everyone to give them a shot?
To my knowledge your intelligence isn't in question either. I was referring to Stack having his spell checker turned off.

Reality is dictated by many factors, including one's own perception of what exactly is reality? Is Santa Claus real? Just because you can't touch something or don't currently own something doesn't mean that you don't have strong feelings toward or against it.

I believe in many of GM's products, just as I think Honda and Toyota put out good products. I just feel that many people discount GM too much and put too much faith in foreign products. I am objective in my assessment of what to buy, sometimes I buy American, sometimes I buy foreign.
Old 02-21-2006, 01:53 PM
  #42  
Site Moderator
Super Moderator
 
sam_spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 48,883
Received 2,868 Likes on 2,080 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Feb 21 2006, 02:35 PM
I believe in many of GM's products, just as I think Honda and Toyota put out good products. I just feel that many people discount GM too much and put too much faith in foreign products. I am objective in my assessment of what to buy, sometimes I buy American, sometimes I buy foreign.
I'll agree with you on that one. I just wish the fit and finish of the domestics was better, mainly on the interior.
Old 02-21-2006, 02:09 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
brockLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

good article there sir! very interesting!

not only is GM betting on fuel cells, but more importantly, ethanol! i think betting on ethanol of the short term is the right idea (it costs some cars 300$ to convert to ethanol which pays for itself in good time and most cars can be converted), but also researching fuel cell technology for the long run.

a good read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel

my bet is GM will come out on top with its R&D related to ethanol. just look for the yellow gas caps.
Old 02-21-2006, 02:13 PM
  #44  

 
Chris Stack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Feb 21 2006, 02:14 PM
I agree, but market and geopolitical forces had as great a hand as the Big 3's complacency on their current situation.
What were the geopolitical forces that affected GM, aside from the Oil Crisis (which should have come as no surprise to GM, since already small, fuel efficient cars like the Beetle were already pretty popular)? I mean, you say "market forces" but isn't it the Big Three's job to read the market and see where it's going, instead of just producing what they think people should buy? It wasn't just fuel efficiency that started the big three's downward slide. IMO, they have no one but themselves to blame.



PS, yeah, sorry, I misspelled one word. That qualifies me for MENSA candidacy around here.
Old 02-21-2006, 02:53 PM
  #45  
Registered User

 
WhiteS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Feb 21 2006, 01:15 PM
Cost inputs are less for the Japanese makes and even lesser for the Korean and soon-to-be Chinese makes over their domestic counterpart.
I am not an accountant, but this is an interesting observation, and I wonder why that is the case. In today's global economy, if the domestics and Japanese (and some Koreans too) are all building their cars in the same countries, why does it cost less for the Japanese? And if the Japanese (and Korean and Chinese) can do it, why can't the domestics do the same as far as cost is concerned?
Old 02-21-2006, 03:04 PM
  #46  

 
Chris Stack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteS2k,Feb 21 2006, 03:53 PM
I am not an accountant, but this is an interesting observation, and I wonder why that is the case. In today's global economy, if the domestics and Japanese (and some Koreans too) are all building their cars in the same countries, why does it cost less for the Japanese? And if the Japanese (and Korean and Chinese) can do it, why can't the domestics do the same as far as cost is concerned?
Domestics are UAW plants, "imports" are not. UAW demands ridiculous concessions, wages, and benefits. "Imports" apparently pay fair wages/benefits, and in return, their employees don't unionize and enjoy more job security, rather than less.
Old 02-21-2006, 03:20 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
slicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wonder how many Mercedes Benz and BMW vehicles Toyota ripped apart when they were initially starting up the Lexus brand.
Old 02-21-2006, 04:03 PM
  #48  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,396
Received 427 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sw05s2k,Feb 21 2006, 02:53 PM
I'll agree with you on that one. I just wish the fit and finish of the domestics was better, mainly on the interior.
I don't want to blame everything on the UAW because GM management agreed to the concessions in the first place. However, take just a grand of that $2,500 in HEALTH care cost and put it in the interior and you see why GM has to cut corners SOMEWHERE. Unfortunately, interior fit and finish is one of safest (literally) places to cut costs, but it's also one of the most visible.

The new Impala, C6, STS, etc. show that GM is trying to put some money back into interior fit, finish, material quality, etc.
Old 02-21-2006, 04:11 PM
  #49  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,396
Received 427 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Stack,Feb 21 2006, 03:13 PM
What were the geopolitical forces that affected GM, aside from the Oil Crisis (which should have come as no surprise to GM, since already small, fuel efficient cars like the Beetle were already pretty popular)? I mean, you say "market forces" but isn't it the Big Three's job to read the market and see where it's going, instead of just producing what they think people should buy? It wasn't just fuel efficiency that started the big three's downward slide. IMO, they have no one but themselves to blame.



PS, yeah, sorry, I misspelled one word. That qualifies me for MENSA candidacy around here.
It wasn't necessarily big, macroeconomic events that dictated the Big 3's fall from power, it was many small mistakes and competitive disadvantages that added up over time. Hindsight is 20/20, but I think the Big 3 did sit on their laurels a bit too long, but even when they wanted to fight back, they had at least one hand tied behind their back the whole time.

Foreign government subsidies, labor and material inputs, copying and improving all favored foreign makes at the expense of domestic market share. The aforementioned oil crisis allowed the foreign makes a foot hold and they capitalized on their success from that point forward. It's a sad story and I'm sure it makes for more than one case study at MBA schools around the country.

You can blame the Big 3 for not reading the market or believing that they could dictate what the consumer could or would buy, but you'd be selling yourself short without looking at the whole picture.
Old 02-21-2006, 04:51 PM
  #50  
Registered User

 
Silverstreak HX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canton
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=QUIKAG,Feb 21 2006, 03:01 PM] Last time I checked, people were brainwashed into buying theoretically superior quality products from overseas filling the coffers of foreign corporations and wreaking havoc on the trade deficit.


Quick Reply: GM does their homework



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 PM.