Gas payback calculator
#21
Registered User
Originally Posted by rai,Jul 9 2008, 02:42 PM
another point, does a hybrid really get 45 mpg? It depends on how you drive. Clarkson did a test with a Prius on the race track he got ~17 mpg. Not saying it's that in real world but if you like to have your foot into it the hybrids are just slow cars with average fuel economy.
When I drove it, my eye was constantly on the gas mileage estimator screen. I was so happy when I got better gas mileage, than worried about acceleration & handling.
On a few trips down to San Diego, when I averaged 75-80 mph all the way down, I averaged 45 mpg. Key is driving smoothly.
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: raleigh
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Elistan,Jul 9 2008, 06:35 AM
On the right side of this MSN page, there's a calculator to determine how many years it'll take for a scooter purchase to pay for itself in gas purchases.
You can also put in numbers to look at going from, say, a truck to a hybrid. Assuming you'd be replacing a vehicle, for purchase price take into account the trade-in value of the old one, and for miles you can use it put the same as your weekly miles. (And for insurance, just put in zero dollars assuming that the new vehicle isn't much more than the old one.)
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Savin....aspx?GT1=33007
Might be of interest to people reading the "Overreacting to gas prices" thread.
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...&f=73&t=608365
For example, if it costs you $20k to trade in your 14 mpg truck for a 45 mpg hybrid, it'd take you 9.77 years to break even driving 200 miles a week with $4/gal gas.
You can also put in numbers to look at going from, say, a truck to a hybrid. Assuming you'd be replacing a vehicle, for purchase price take into account the trade-in value of the old one, and for miles you can use it put the same as your weekly miles. (And for insurance, just put in zero dollars assuming that the new vehicle isn't much more than the old one.)
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Savin....aspx?GT1=33007
Might be of interest to people reading the "Overreacting to gas prices" thread.
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...&f=73&t=608365
For example, if it costs you $20k to trade in your 14 mpg truck for a 45 mpg hybrid, it'd take you 9.77 years to break even driving 200 miles a week with $4/gal gas.
You would have had a 9 year (older) truck and nothing to show for it.
#24
Originally Posted by qsmarcei,Jul 10 2008, 06:27 AM
I dont think a g35 is going to net you 30mpg average.
It's not really breaking even. You own a newer, more desirable car. You would have spent the money one way or another (gas or car).
It's not really breaking even. You own a newer, more desirable car. You would have spent the money one way or another (gas or car).
What makes you think the G35 is more desireable TO ME than the SUV? I get great visibility in traffic, I can haul people and cargo, I have towing capacity, I can argue that in real-world driving situations I am safer, there is much more interior room for the driver.
Also, I didn't factor in interest on a $20,000 loan. I also didn't talk about the fact that the truck is paid for means that I don't have a car payment at all. The calculator also doesn't factor in the depreciation of a new car. So if I buy a brand new G35, the minute I drive it off the lot, I have lost money there too.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: raleigh
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think we are in agreement that the formula is vague and doesn't contain the amount of variables needed to make a sound decision.
The value of your truck to YOU has no bearing on its financial burden. Just because you need it, you want it, or you would prefer to use it doesnt mean it cost you any less. We buy things because we want them or need them and deal with the financial burdens accordingly.
The value of your truck to YOU has no bearing on its financial burden. Just because you need it, you want it, or you would prefer to use it doesnt mean it cost you any less. We buy things because we want them or need them and deal with the financial burdens accordingly.
#26
Well, but it is still relevant to the conversation. Otherwise, everyone would be driving electric smart cars.
The car needs to fit the needs of the driver, and if I have to spend $20,000 to get a different car that meets my needs, then the finances just DON'T add up, since the current car meets the needs.
If I could meet my needs for no more than ~ $4000 it is getting closer, but much beyond that cost differential, the numbers just don't justify it.
When this car no longer meets my needs, either because my needs change, or the car does (breaks catastrophically for example) then the value proposition changes.
The car needs to fit the needs of the driver, and if I have to spend $20,000 to get a different car that meets my needs, then the finances just DON'T add up, since the current car meets the needs.
If I could meet my needs for no more than ~ $4000 it is getting closer, but much beyond that cost differential, the numbers just don't justify it.
When this car no longer meets my needs, either because my needs change, or the car does (breaks catastrophically for example) then the value proposition changes.
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Manuel Antonio
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Malloric,Jul 9 2008, 10:47 PM
..something other than the $200 extra gas it costs you to drive a conspicuous vehicle is what is driving your switch.
My original post was simply to give an example of how much money can be saved by making a switch. Oh, and to answer your question, with the amount of miles I drive, based on gas prices currently, the A4 will save me $500/month in gas alone. The payments will be around $200/month cheaper and maintenance & insurance will be considerably cheaper. I will instantly be near $800/month making the switch and as gas prices continue to soar (can you say $7/gallon??) I will be well beyond that savings a month.
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: raleigh
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ruexp67,Jul 10 2008, 07:22 AM
Well, but it is still relevant to the conversation. Otherwise, everyone would be driving electric smart cars.
The car needs to fit the needs of the driver, and if I have to spend $20,000 to get a different car that meets my needs, then the finances just DON'T add up, since the current car meets the needs.
If I could meet my needs for no more than ~ $4000 it is getting closer, but much beyond that cost differential, the numbers just don't justify it.
When this car no longer meets my needs, either because my needs change, or the car does (breaks catastrophically for example) then the value proposition changes.
The car needs to fit the needs of the driver, and if I have to spend $20,000 to get a different car that meets my needs, then the finances just DON'T add up, since the current car meets the needs.
If I could meet my needs for no more than ~ $4000 it is getting closer, but much beyond that cost differential, the numbers just don't justify it.
When this car no longer meets my needs, either because my needs change, or the car does (breaks catastrophically for example) then the value proposition changes.
My comment of owning a more desirable car was just the fact that it is newer, and easier to sell. If you could pay off a 30,000$ car in 9 years by not driving a truck. That , to me, is a no brainer. Obviously we are very different.
nice vette
#29
Originally Posted by qsmarcei,Jul 10 2008, 05:26 PM
You chose the g35 as your own data point. I will not attempt to persuade you from your own data point. I will not prove the utility of your selection over your current situation. I dont know you from steve.
My comment of owning a more desirable car was just the fact that it is newer, and easier to sell. If you could pay off a 30,000$ car in 9 years by not driving a truck. That , to me, is a no brainer. Obviously we are very different.
nice vette
My comment of owning a more desirable car was just the fact that it is newer, and easier to sell. If you could pay off a 30,000$ car in 9 years by not driving a truck. That , to me, is a no brainer. Obviously we are very different.
nice vette
#30
Originally Posted by yellow2001,Jul 9 2008, 08:41 AM
it really depends on the numbers. i play around with the calulator
my sti = i average about 18 mpg (thats if i shift at 3k rpm and not go into boost)
gas mileage for the scooter = 80 mpg (i am using there numbers)
price per gallom = $4.25 for the good stuff
miles I drive per week = 250 miles
miles per week you can use your scooter = 100 miles. I would only drive to work
amount you cold save a year = $951.53
price for scooter = i would buy use so, $2000
yearly insurance = no idea on scooter insurance
years to break even = 2.1 years
that calulator does not include, maintance, tires, repairs.
if gas is at 5.00, years to break even = 1.79 years
if gas is at 6.00, years to break even = 1.49 years
the articale does say that you can not carry a flat screen tv or winter. no winters here in houston and how many flat screens do people buy? i rare have them deliver it.
my sti = i average about 18 mpg (thats if i shift at 3k rpm and not go into boost)
gas mileage for the scooter = 80 mpg (i am using there numbers)
price per gallom = $4.25 for the good stuff
miles I drive per week = 250 miles
miles per week you can use your scooter = 100 miles. I would only drive to work
amount you cold save a year = $951.53
price for scooter = i would buy use so, $2000
yearly insurance = no idea on scooter insurance
years to break even = 2.1 years
that calulator does not include, maintance, tires, repairs.
if gas is at 5.00, years to break even = 1.79 years
if gas is at 6.00, years to break even = 1.49 years
the articale does say that you can not carry a flat screen tv or winter. no winters here in houston and how many flat screens do people buy? i rare have them deliver it.
Had one of those in college. Good time.