Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Ford Taurus

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-03-2009, 07:01 AM
  #11  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Big, heavy, dumb-looking car, with engine mounted fwd-style, transversely in front of the front wheels. It has a few ponies I guess, but I don't understand the hype AT ALL, particularly on an S2000 forum!
Old 10-03-2009, 07:59 AM
  #12  
Registered User

 
sahtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They have to start somewhere. "who cares, it's still a hyundai" didn't last either.
Old 10-03-2009, 08:15 AM
  #13  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I don't see the Taurus as a good "start" for ANYthing.
Unless they evolve it into a much lighter-weight rwd sport sedan (never happen).
Old 10-03-2009, 08:18 AM
  #14  
Former Moderator

 
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks like a very promising car.
Old 10-03-2009, 08:18 AM
  #15  

 
Bboy AJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYSE
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Very cool. I enjoyed the demonstrations. It means a lot more than just salesman talk. I imagine these examples would sell more cars, but there's the difficulty of getting people in the showrooms to begin with.

Tanner Foust is a cool guy. The blindspot example was just so ridiculous, though. You can tell it's extremely scripted, although it makes its point. Just to an incredulous degree

Thanks for posting this. Ford is on the up and up. Good for them.
Old 10-03-2009, 08:19 AM
  #16  

 
Bboy AJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYSE
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Oct 3 2009, 11:15 AM
I don't see the Taurus as a good "start" for ANYthing.
Unless they evolve it into a much lighter-weight rwd sport sedan (never happen).
Ridiculous.

Old 10-03-2009, 08:33 AM
  #17  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

What's ridiculous is yet another 4000 lb. step in the wrong direction.

Ford's on the wrong side of history with this one.
Old 10-03-2009, 09:29 AM
  #18  

 
Anrosphynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Oct 3 2009, 08:33 AM
What's ridiculous is yet another 4000 lb. step in the wrong direction.

Ford's on the wrong side of history with this one.
go sit in a Camry, then go sit in a new Taurus..


Report back.....
Old 10-03-2009, 09:33 AM
  #19  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

And then compare MSRP. The Taurus gets pretty expensive loaded up like that SHO! You get a lot but you pay a lot as well.
Old 10-03-2009, 09:58 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
shyong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My folks had a Taurus wagon which was bought new in 1988...car lasted all of 3 years before the tranny went bad, among numerous other problems. That was enough of a bad taste to never purchase another Ford, let alone another Taurus.


Quick Reply: Ford Taurus



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:28 PM.