Fit vs. 2010 NSX
07-23-2008 | 10:30 AM
#11
Former Moderator
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 25,439
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by cbehney,Jul 23 2008, 01:33 PM
Fit wins:
Absence of insane currency conversion errors
It exists
Number of posts about it
New NSX wins:
Ultra-exclusivity -- absolutely no one you know has a new NSX...
Absence of insane currency conversion errors
It exists
Number of posts about it
New NSX wins:
Ultra-exclusivity -- absolutely no one you know has a new NSX...
OMFG...classic...simply classic!!!
07-23-2008 | 12:24 PM
#13
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
From: anaheim
Originally Posted by Jakup,Jul 23 2008, 10:17 AM
You can buy 10 Fits for the price of one NSX, and since they have ~100HP per fit, that's 1,000HP. No way NSX is making that much.
Isn't it like 109 hp? So technically 1090 hp!
07-23-2008 | 02:16 PM
#15
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Tustin, CA
You guys have it all wrong. That car that everyone keeps seeing in camo on the Nurburgring is actually the new Fit. How else could it possibly be so fast?
Then again, it's supposedly slower than the GTR so maybe it's not a Fit after all.
Then again, it's supposedly slower than the GTR so maybe it's not a Fit after all.
07-23-2008 | 05:45 PM
#20
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale
depends on whether the Fit is the standard model or the Chuck Norris Special Edition.
In light of the hp/L thread, I'm going to make up my own meaningless metric for this comparison: Mileage per seat. And to keep the spirit of NSX threads, I'll make up my own numbers and refer to them as fact:
Fit: 36mpg / 4 seats = 9mpg/seat
NSX: 22mpg / 2 seats = 11mpg/seat
Clearly the NSX is the better car by this measure and the engineers should give themselves a pat on the back for a job well done. Chuck would be proud.
Or he would give them a roundhouse to the face.
In light of the hp/L thread, I'm going to make up my own meaningless metric for this comparison: Mileage per seat. And to keep the spirit of NSX threads, I'll make up my own numbers and refer to them as fact:
Fit: 36mpg / 4 seats = 9mpg/seat
NSX: 22mpg / 2 seats = 11mpg/seat
Clearly the NSX is the better car by this measure and the engineers should give themselves a pat on the back for a job well done. Chuck would be proud.
Or he would give them a roundhouse to the face.