EVO MR FQ400 beats Pagani Zonda!
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Come see me after class.
Posts: 20,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pantyraider,Sep 13 2004, 09:58 PM
The EVO isn't faster than the EVO from 0-100, 0-150, 0-200. I doubt it's faster around a track either, but who knows about that.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slamnasty,Sep 14 2004, 03:59 AM
That is impressive, but how many Zondas do you see driving around?
By the way, $81,000 for an Evo actually makes the Zonda start to look like a good value.
But I guess it could be argued that any Evo pushing out 400hp (which isn't that difficult) could put down similar numbers, which is impressive. Still a stupid article though.
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laguna Beach
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey, I'd take the Zonda over the EVO even if it only made 250HP. Those cars are the look of pure sex on wheels - and the Evo is a three bagger (one to throw up in in case both hers and yours fall off).
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Las Olas and Brickell, FL
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Veneficus,Sep 13 2004, 11:14 PM
It's more than how fast you are. Otherwise we would all trade in our S2000 for used F-bodies.
The F body goes fast in a straight line....the evo goes fast forwards, backwards, upside down, and right side up.