Enzo vs. 1984 Audi Sport Quattro
#22
Ignorance is driving a VW.
#23
Ignorance is driving a VW.
#24
Registered User
The Audi may be a hair faster to 100km/h (probably not all the time even), but do you think the handling and especially braking are better than the Enzo? What about rolling acceleration? I think NOT. Plus, is anyone going to give a rat's ass when they see the Audi driving down the street? NOT!
Enzo. All day, every day.
Enzo. All day, every day.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Collingwood
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Group B cars were wild, wild things (Porsche 959, Ferrari 288 GTO, Lancia Delta S4, MG Metro 6R4, Ford RS200, Peugeot 205 T16, etc).
There was a real beauty in their functionality, same as a clubman, same as a Radical SR4/SR8, etc.
The Quattro Sport had a kevlar roof and panels, contrary to that article I believe that it also had the 20V (4 valve head). The insanely worked ones are true monsters. People have tried to build replicas in England. Have a look at the Pikes Peak Audi Sport Quattro S1 for a real ball tearer.
There should be a video floating around on the net showing a Swiss-tuned black Quattro Sport doing doughnuts.
After the 288 GTO Ferrari
There was a real beauty in their functionality, same as a clubman, same as a Radical SR4/SR8, etc.
The Quattro Sport had a kevlar roof and panels, contrary to that article I believe that it also had the 20V (4 valve head). The insanely worked ones are true monsters. People have tried to build replicas in England. Have a look at the Pikes Peak Audi Sport Quattro S1 for a real ball tearer.
There should be a video floating around on the net showing a Swiss-tuned black Quattro Sport doing doughnuts.
After the 288 GTO Ferrari
#26
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Westerville OH
Posts: 6,891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tafka TMB' date='Feb 2 2005, 10:07 PM
P.P.S. Scott Evil - Audi were competing against the new mid engined machines. The Sport had (amongst other things) a chunk taken out of it's wheelbase to try and increase it's nimbleness. I don't think that it was that sucessful (compared to the original Audi Quattro).
Thanks for the added facts.
#28
i guess its not clear to you.. so ill try and help you out...i dont like the enzo, infact i strongly dislike it, the car does nothing for me thus i would take the audi over it...im actually not seeing why its so hard for someone to have a dissenting oppinion no matter how retarted you may see it...im actually not sure as to why you are devoting so much of your time trying to explain my opinion, its actually quite sad, even a brain dead liar would agree
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Purple sky
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JettaGT' date='Feb 2 2005, 09:26 PM
i guess its not clear to you.. so ill try and help you out...i dont like the enzo, infact i strongly dislike it, the car does nothing for me thus i would take the audi over it...im actually not seeing why its so hard for someone to have a dissenting oppinion no matter how retarted you may see it...im actually not sure as to why you are devoting so much of your time trying to explain my opinion, its actually quite sad, even a brain dead liar would agree
#30
Originally Posted by Clayman' date='Feb 2 2005, 04:31 PM
The Audi may be a hair faster to 100km/h (probably not all the time even), but do you think the handling and especially braking are better than the Enzo? What about rolling acceleration? I think NOT. Plus, is anyone going to give a rat's ass when they see the Audi driving down the street? NOT!
Enzo. All day, every day.
Enzo. All day, every day.
Me think that Quattro will not only go around corners like an muther, but will take the off roads in the same way. Audi may not be pretty but its a whole lot more useful than the Enzo. Anyway, this comparo is dumb. Its just comparing the acceleration of each car that's all.