Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Elise's Engine or S2000's engine

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-31-2005, 11:42 AM
  #1  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
mintswack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Elise's Engine or S2000's engine

Well I haven't been in this forum long enough to know if this has been posted before, but I'm really curious to which engine is better. I know that the elise's engine is a toyota's, and it's basically a knock off of VTEC. Correct me if I'm wrong, this is just what I know. The Elise's engine displacement at 1.8 liters and S2000's engine at 2.0 and 2.2 liters. For a 1.8 liter engine, the toyota engine makes about 190hp correct? I think it's very impressive for the engine size. Not sure how much of a weight difference there is between the s2000's and Elise's, but the Elise is a fast car. Not only that, but the fuel economy on that car is above 30mpg. The s2000's engine, it's slightly bigger, but why is the fuel economy rather poor for a 4 cylinder. I also own an accord v6 and i averaged about 27mpg. Similar to my s2000's mpg. So guys and girls, that's all I know so far in contrast of the engines. Please inform me and give your opinion on which is the better engine. Thanks!
Old 10-31-2005, 11:46 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Christople's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Corn Country
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The elise engine is from Toyota which was stuck into the Celica GT-S


They just redid some stuff to it.
Old 10-31-2005, 11:51 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
S2k03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Austin
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Both are good engines. In my opinion the S2000 is probably a little more advanced than the vvti toyota engine.
Old 10-31-2005, 11:53 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
lukemc01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the Elise engine is better in the Elise and the S2000 engine is better in the S2000...

I guess the point is that since the Elise/Toyota transverse designed engine and the S2000 F20 longitudinal engine is really hard to compare out of their vehicles. Now, if you were to compare the toyota engine vs. the K20 series...
Old 10-31-2005, 11:57 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Saab9-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Elise's engine gets better mileage for two very big reasons: lower output and about 1,000 fewer pounds of car to lug around.
Old 10-31-2005, 12:00 PM
  #6  

 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,396
Received 427 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

I had the Elise motor in my 2003 Pontiac Vibe GT. It felt really flat in the midrange, had OKAY low-end, especially for a 1.8L. The top end when 'lift' (Toyota's equivalent of VTEC) kicked in around 6,200rpm was a blast, especially with a cold air intake. That sucker really screamed on up to it's 8,250 fuel cutoff.

In the Elise, they reprogrammed the ECU, added a bit more aggressive exhaust, and bumped the rev limit a little bit. They also added an oil cooler for durability.

I would say the S2000 motor is a bit better and more advanced. The good fuel economy in the Elise is due to that car weighing 800!!! LBS less than an S2000.

The 2ZZ motor from Toyota is currently in the following cars (off the top of my head)

Toyota Matrix XRS
Toyota Corolla XRS
Toyota Celica GTS
Pontiac Vibe GT
Lotus Elise

As you can see, the S2000 motor is definitely more 'rare' if anything. The F20 has only ever gone in the S2000.
Old 10-31-2005, 12:11 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Euclid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SLC
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The F20 is a better engine. The 2zz has some issues as does the tranny it's coupled to. As for being technically advanced.. It probably depends on what you're looking at. The F20C is advanced in that you can rev to 9k all day everyday, but the 2zz has a more advanced valvetrain with it's VVTL-i, which is more like i-VTEC.
Old 10-31-2005, 12:15 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
YellowS2kPwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Oct 31 2005, 01:00 PM
I had the Elise motor in my 2003 Pontiac Vibe GT. It felt really flat in the midrange, had OKAY low-end, especially for a 1.8L. The top end when 'lift' (Toyota's equivalent of VTEC) kicked in around 6,200rpm was a blast, especially with a cold air intake. That sucker really screamed on up to it's 8,250 fuel cutoff.

In the Elise, they reprogrammed the ECU, added a bit more aggressive exhaust, and bumped the rev limit a little bit. They also added an oil cooler for durability.

I would say the S2000 motor is a bit better and more advanced. The good fuel economy in the Elise is due to that car weighing 800!!! LBS less than an S2000.

The 2ZZ motor from Toyota is currently in the following cars (off the top of my head)

Toyota Matrix XRS
Toyota Corolla XRS
Toyota Celica GTS
Pontiac Vibe GT
Lotus Elise

As you can see, the S2000 motor is definitely more 'rare' if anything. The F20 has only ever gone in the S2000.


You beat me to it. The s2000 is 120 hp/litre, toyota engine puts out 100/litre but with the elise, they used a different ecu so bumped it up to 190 hp instead of 180. I've driven my friend's toyota matrix xrs and it feels weak.
Old 10-31-2005, 03:02 PM
  #9  
Registered User

 
PeaceLove&S2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 19,255
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Honda also makes a 1.8L engine that makes 195hp (200hp in the Sun International Elise).
Old 10-31-2005, 03:09 PM
  #10  

 
rich337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 1,107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the 2ZZ vs. K20 or B18C5 seems like a more logical comparison


Quick Reply: Elise's Engine or S2000's engine



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 AM.