Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.
View Poll Results: Do you think auto-racing is a sport and are race car drivers athletes?
Yes, auto racing is a sport and the drivers are athletes
78.38%
Yes, auto racing is a sport, but the drivers are NOT athletes.
16.76%
No, auto racing is not a sport, but the drivers ARE athletes.
1.62%
No, auto racing is not a sport and the drivers are not athletes.
3.24%
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll

Do you think auto-racing is a sport and are race car drivers athletes?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-02-2008, 08:08 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
Jimmies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by patinum,Dec 2 2008, 09:04 AM
But to go along with it, you could consider a race team like a football or basketball team. A non-athlete could be on a good team and still win as well.
Yep, and to further that analogy - when I played high school football, none of us considered the kicker to be a football player
Old 12-02-2008, 08:08 AM
  #52  
Member (Premium)
 
vader1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: MAHT-O-MEDI
Posts: 11,857
Received 438 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by patinum,Dec 2 2008, 11:04 AM
It's all semantics anyway. But to go along with it, you could consider a race team like a football or basketball team. A non-athlete could be on a good team and still win as well.
Yeah, I watch basketball and consider it a sport, but my Timberwolves seemed to be filled with non-athletes.
Old 12-02-2008, 08:16 AM
  #53  
Registered User
 
nfty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jimmies,Dec 2 2008, 06:58 AM
Actually, I voted no, and this was me running the first Auto X of this year. In the brutal cold of Chicago no less. That fact doesn't make me an athlete either. The fact that I play basketball, bench 1.5 times my weight, squat more than double my weight, and can do pullups till I'm bored does though



I can't take credit for it - all credit for that line belongs to Weird Al Yankovic



At the end of it all, there's no right or wrong. It's all opinion. Mine just happens to be the correct one.
^^^^^^ Oh sh*t, and you must have a killa haircut too....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JMOh-cul6M

LOL!!!!!
Old 12-02-2008, 08:20 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
nfty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by vader1,Dec 2 2008, 08:32 AM
In auto racing a guy can win not because of his own skill, but his crew is better, the parts in his car don't fail, his machine is superior, he has more financial support, etc. Its not man versus man in a contest that relies only on skill. Skill is a part of it, but just a fraction.
This is possible, but when all other factors are as equivalent as they can be, say like in spec racing where the cars all have to be the same car? Or heck even in WRC or F1 where they introduce handicaps to cars that may otherwise have unfair mechanical/technical advantages.....

It's all skills.

If you think skills are only a small part of it, why not head over to a decent indoor karting facility and put your skills to the test. The karts are all basically the same, the rest boils down to power to weight ratio and more importantly SKILL (or lack thereof)
Old 12-02-2008, 08:25 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
Jimmies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by nfty,Dec 2 2008, 09:16 AM
^^^^^^ Oh sh*t, and you must have a killa haircut too....


Haha! That's awesome.
Old 12-02-2008, 08:39 AM
  #56  
Gold Member (Premium)
 
patinum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Second City
Posts: 5,569
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

So it seems there are really 2 factors here. Skill and physical conditioning. To take this onto an entirely nerdy level, you could graph importance of skill against physical conditioning (weighted if you like).

0 skill and 0 physical conditioning is obviously not an athlete.

100 skill and 0 physical conditioning is not an athlete either - example: you could be skilled a photography, and win photography competitions, but that doesn't make you an athlete.

0 skill and 100 physical conditioning I would consider an athlete. Example: running or weigh lifting, okay, some skill required but it is mostly physical.

100 skill and 100 physical conditioning is definitely an athlete. Example, basketball players. You're doing more than just running around, and you're doing more than just shooting free throws.

The gray areas are the parts in between. In F1 or endurance racing, physical conditioning and skill is very important. Skill and conditioning are only somewhat important in drag racing. Other areas are gray as well - consider golf, bowling, archery, luge, curling, competitive eating, and pool.
Old 12-02-2008, 08:50 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
nfty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ Excellent NERD-analysis. Clearly you are a member of Lambda Lambda Lambda!!!

So to continue your thought.... What about professional video gamers? Unless we're talking DDR endurance champions, they're definitely not athletes! LOL! hehehe
Old 12-02-2008, 09:00 AM
  #58  
Registered User
 
luder_5555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i would say that they are most definately atheletes, just to take the constant pull of 3-4 g's in alternating directions, for hours, that takes huge amoungs of strength.

figure just 3 g's, that means each of your arms would weigh about 60 pounds, so go through your day with a forty pound weight in each hand for a couple hours, better yet go drive for two hours on the hottest day of the year with the heat cranked all the way, and tell me if thats a workout or not.
Old 12-02-2008, 09:10 AM
  #59  

 
TommyDeVito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,184
Received 410 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Yep pulling G's is no joke. Maybe not Nascrap, but F1 drivers sure are in decent shape. Motorcycle racers, particularly MotoGP, are some of the most fit on the planet. They must have endurance, and strength, while staying as lean as possible.
Old 12-02-2008, 10:27 AM
  #60  
Registered User

 
Bz2005s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by vader1,Dec 2 2008, 10:08 AM
Yeah, I watch basketball and consider it a sport, but my Timberwolves seemed to be filled with non-athletes.
Same way I feel about my Detroit Lions right now

This was kind of the point I was trying to make in my first post. SOME race car drivers are athletes but not all IMO. Just because you drive a 700hp car around for four hours does not automatically make you an athlete in my book even if you can turn decent times.

I like the NERD analogy the best


Quick Reply: Do you think auto-racing is a sport and are race car drivers athletes?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:20 PM.