Cool new 4-cycle engine design....
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: hampshire
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think this engine will produce tons of torque... if you think about it.. its getiing pushed 3X as often as a regular engine, therefore that should mean smoother acceleration. i think they could go somewhere with this.
#22
I saw this engine on a little standoutside the motor show about 10 years ago. Very impressive design.
Unfortunately, like the Sarrich Orbital, it is relegated to a life of obscurity in a world of conventional crank and rod.
Unfortunately, like the Sarrich Orbital, it is relegated to a life of obscurity in a world of conventional crank and rod.
#24
Registered User
Originally Posted by no_really' date='Feb 10 2005, 08:34 PM
I think you are wrong here - if the piston shaft pushes a wheel that forces a camlobe to the side, the opposite force is going to be applied to the piston shaft, and eventually to the cylinder walls, causing the piston to rock in the cylinder.
I don't see how it could be any oher way
I don't see how it could be any oher way
#25
Registered User
Originally Posted by ADAM_ROB_UK' date='Feb 11 2005, 02:37 AM
i think this engine will produce tons of torque... if you think about it.. its getiing pushed 3X as often as a regular engine, therefore that should mean smoother acceleration. i think they could go somewhere with this.
#26
Registered User
Originally Posted by AusS2000' date='Feb 11 2005, 05:22 AM
I saw this engine on a little standoutside the motor show about 10 years ago. Very impressive design.
Unfortunately, like the Sarrich Orbital, it is relegated to a life of obscurity in a world of conventional crank and rod.
Unfortunately, like the Sarrich Orbital, it is relegated to a life of obscurity in a world of conventional crank and rod.
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: hampshire
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Elistan' date='Feb 11 2005, 02:47 PM
Sure, it'll produce 3x the torque - but at 1/3 the rotational speed. Therefore horsepower is exactly the same. You can get the EXACT same effect by putting a 3:1 reduction gear at the end of the engine crank. So it's an interesting result of the engine design, but from what I can tell it's not of any actual benefit.
but another thought... if you are rotating the engine 3x its normal speed.. wont that cause a huge amount of ware issues, as you are putting 3x the usage on it ?
#28
Registered User
Originally Posted by ADAM_ROB_UK' date='Feb 11 2005, 08:57 AM
^^^ good point i should have thought a bit harder !
but another thought... if you are rotating the engine 3x its normal speed.. wont that cause a huge amount of ware issues, as you are putting 3x the usage on it ?
but another thought... if you are rotating the engine 3x its normal speed.. wont that cause a huge amount of ware issues, as you are putting 3x the usage on it ?
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ADAM_ROB_UK' date='Feb 11 2005, 05:48 AM
also.... how do they get that opposing rotation ??
Whereas the yellow trilobe's position starts with its respective piston wheels on one side of a lobe peak, the green trilobe's position starts with its respective piston wheels on the opposite side of that same respective lobe peak. Therefore it's using the horizontal force of the pistons to produce two rotational forces when coupled with the shape of the trilobes.
This dual, simultaneous coutner-rotation likely keeps the forces pushing and pulling the pistons even.