CNG anyone
#11
I looked into getting a GX before I bought my Si. I researched the Phill as well. The suburb close to me (1 over) has CNG pumps as their city vehicles run on them. I spent some considerable time researching all of this. I'd have to purchase a GX in California and put it on a trailer to Texas. The closest Phill installer was in OK, so I'd have to pay to have him drive down here. The problem, I found, is maintenance. If part of the CNG system needs work, my local dealer wouldn't work on the car so if something needs work you have to ship it to one of those dealers in NY or CA? It seemed like too much hassle so I dropped the idea
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plano
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vader1,Sep 11 2008, 01:04 PM
I agree with the first part but disagree with the second. The turbines have an expensive up front cost but make a lot of power and run without much maintenance for years. We also have giant swatches of land that can produce huge power. The biggest problem is they are out in the middle of nowhere and you have to build expensive transmission lines. Get passed the upfront cost and you got pretty limitless energy forever.
Heck the Dakotas are pretty much flat unihabited corridors of constant high wind. Just gotta get the juice to where someone lives.
I don't see how CNG is a solution though for cars. It would be easier to just have the wind turbines recharge electric cars than use CNG large scale.
A big turbine can be about $3 mill without the transmission lines, but can pay for themselves in a few years from generation.
Heck the Dakotas are pretty much flat unihabited corridors of constant high wind. Just gotta get the juice to where someone lives.
I don't see how CNG is a solution though for cars. It would be easier to just have the wind turbines recharge electric cars than use CNG large scale.
A big turbine can be about $3 mill without the transmission lines, but can pay for themselves in a few years from generation.
Wind farms are also very expensive to hook to the grid because you have to run power transmission lines all over a large area, where a power plant's output is in one location.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would consider a CNG car if they were available here. There is a CNG fueling station open to the public 3 miles from my home. It currently costs about 40% less than gasoline per mile. But if everyone had CNG cars all of a sudden, then that cost savings would disappear very rapidly...
Andrew
Andrew
#14
Originally Posted by aklucsarits,Sep 12 2008, 12:44 PM
I would consider a CNG car if they were available here.
...
...
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2009/honda/civi...rchlanding.html
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fredericksburg
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Right now, the trouble with CNG is the limited vehicle cruising range and the lack of public fueling stations.
As an earlier poster pointed out, the local gas utilities may be hard pressed to find spare capacity in their systems to accommodate the incremental demand for home fueling units, which would be nice.
And finally, if CNG would somehow catch on, expect state and local governments to tax it it, thereby wiping out the cost advantage over gasoline.
As an earlier poster pointed out, the local gas utilities may be hard pressed to find spare capacity in their systems to accommodate the incremental demand for home fueling units, which would be nice.
And finally, if CNG would somehow catch on, expect state and local governments to tax it it, thereby wiping out the cost advantage over gasoline.
#17
The range is okay, but coupled with the limited fuel stations it's a killer. In Sacramento area there were a couple fueling stations that weren't too far out of my normal routine. With the 170 mile range it would have been extremely annoying, but doable for day-to-day. But if I ever wanted to go on a long trip it would have been out. You can get the home refueling stations, but they run at around 3-4 grand and you still can't go for long trips.
What they need is more fueling stations. And yes, it should be taxed. Unless they tax it at $2/gallon, which is unlikely given how small the gasoline tax is, it'd still be cheaper than oil not to mention much cleaner.
What they need is more fueling stations. And yes, it should be taxed. Unless they tax it at $2/gallon, which is unlikely given how small the gasoline tax is, it'd still be cheaper than oil not to mention much cleaner.
#18
Former Moderator
Where energy is concerned, the more options the better. When you have competition with several alternative choices, consumers win.
I'm sure many consumers would choose CNG cars with the right infrastructure available, especially for DD commuters (possibly even plug-in hybrids...Chevy Volt using CNG for its internal combustion engine perhaps).
As demand is destroyed by those no longer using gasoline, the price of gasoline will fall...or at least production will fall allowing the use of that finite resource to last longer while better alternatives are developed.
But as pointed out...infrastructure would be needed. I personally would rather government spend my tax money on domestic infrastructure (or provide tax incentives to stimulate private infrastructure development)...especially over some other very expensive international endeavors of the recent past.
As far as wind power...got to start some where. 100yrs ago the Wright Bros. had a pretty inefficient contraption that they catapulted into the air. And it needed lots of new infrastructure to make it practical. 66yrs later, the first contraption took to the air able to move 100 people across the Atlantic in 3.5hrs...and in the same year a couple guys walked on the moon.
I would hope that eventually, more use of individual power production will be allowed. Smaller wind generators, coupled with solar panels, at homes where favorable environmental conditions exist potentially would have an impact on fossil fuel consumption. Of course there are some changes that would need to happen with HOAs to make that a reality.
I'm sure many consumers would choose CNG cars with the right infrastructure available, especially for DD commuters (possibly even plug-in hybrids...Chevy Volt using CNG for its internal combustion engine perhaps).
As demand is destroyed by those no longer using gasoline, the price of gasoline will fall...or at least production will fall allowing the use of that finite resource to last longer while better alternatives are developed.
But as pointed out...infrastructure would be needed. I personally would rather government spend my tax money on domestic infrastructure (or provide tax incentives to stimulate private infrastructure development)...especially over some other very expensive international endeavors of the recent past.
As far as wind power...got to start some where. 100yrs ago the Wright Bros. had a pretty inefficient contraption that they catapulted into the air. And it needed lots of new infrastructure to make it practical. 66yrs later, the first contraption took to the air able to move 100 people across the Atlantic in 3.5hrs...and in the same year a couple guys walked on the moon.
I would hope that eventually, more use of individual power production will be allowed. Smaller wind generators, coupled with solar panels, at homes where favorable environmental conditions exist potentially would have an impact on fossil fuel consumption. Of course there are some changes that would need to happen with HOAs to make that a reality.
#19
Registered User
Heh, I like the CNG Volt idea.
I'm wondering how GM plans to get around gas going bad in the tank if not used for months. Say all you do is commute in your volt and your plug-in power covers it 100%. Won't the gasoline in the car go bad unless you add stabilizer? I'm thinking they might used a "forced" duty cycle, where the engine runs 10% of the time whether you need it or not.
Anyone know?
I'm wondering how GM plans to get around gas going bad in the tank if not used for months. Say all you do is commute in your volt and your plug-in power covers it 100%. Won't the gasoline in the car go bad unless you add stabilizer? I'm thinking they might used a "forced" duty cycle, where the engine runs 10% of the time whether you need it or not.
Anyone know?
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdelena,Sep 12 2008, 04:51 PM
Has been available for awhile. Here is one...
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2009/honda/civi...rchlanding.html
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2009/honda/civi...rchlanding.html
Andrew