which car to choose?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

02-06-2007, 08:24 AM

#21

Yunisden R

Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2002

Location: Plantation

Posts: 375

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

STS-V for sure

Reply Like

02-06-2007, 06:08 PM

#22

gomarlins3

Join Date: Dec 2001

Location: Kuna Idaho

Posts: 23,083

Likes: 1,724

Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Boxster S and then the SLK. If it was the SLK 55, there would be no doubt.

Reply Like

02-06-2007, 06:11 PM

#23

Saki GT

Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004

Location: Queen City, NC

Posts: 35,992

Likes: 264

Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts

STS-V without a doubt - its a really nice car and it seats four.

Reply Like

02-06-2007, 06:13 PM

#24

Saki GT

Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004

Location: Queen City, NC

Posts: 35,992

Likes: 264

Received 215 Likes on 148 Posts

ps - slush boxes are autos.

Reply Like

02-07-2007, 06:17 AM

#25

vtec9

Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: Connecticut

Posts: 10,106

Likes: 0

Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

clk 350 is a piece of junk.. not a sports car at all

Since you already have the S2K, I would choose the STS-V for sure.. 469 hp from a blown V8? How can you go wrong

Reply Like

02-07-2007, 06:27 AM

#26

sprix!

Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2005

Location: Atlanta, GA

Posts: 2,343

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

[QUOTE=vtec9,Feb 7 2007, 10:17 AM] clk 350 is a piece of junk.. not a sports car at all

Reply Like

02-07-2007, 06:39 AM

#27

vtec9

Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: Connecticut

Posts: 10,106

Likes: 0

Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

I meant to type slk.. clk was a slip of mind. I knew which car I was referring to. I did not mean the SLK was junk in the sense that its a bad car, just that its not a sports car. Get behind the wheel of one and tell me how it compares so any real sports car