Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.
View Poll Results: If you had the choice for $32K ?
Boxster
28.42%
S2000
71.58%
Voters: 190. You may not vote on this poll

Boxster vs S2000 straight up

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-15-2004, 07:58 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
dbjb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Canton
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rai,Aug 14 2004, 01:47 PM
True that
thats a good point.

I wonder if Porsche has something in the works in order to compete with the new Elise?

$20k more for a Boxster S and it cant even sniff an Elise at the track.
Old 08-15-2004, 09:10 AM
  #52  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]How much are you willing to wager? When it comes down to it, you'd take your money and run before you put it on the Boxster to match the S2000 in any road course or autocross. There is no mistake that the base Boxster WILL get spanked on any course or autocross. If you have no experience with autocross or road course, please don't speak out of your ass.
Old 08-15-2004, 01:05 PM
  #53  
rai
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: mount airy
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dbjb,Aug 15 2004, 07:58 AM
I wonder if Porsche has something in the works in order to compete with the new Elise?

$20k more for a Boxster S and it cant even sniff an Elise at the track.
On one hand the Elise can be called overpriced (same price as a C5 Z06 after discount). Yet to think the base Boxster cost's just about as much...


BTW 90% of cars are not taken to the track, so "track times" are mostly academic. I mean in a sense if the Boxster is more functional (daily driver) than a S2000 or Elise and that's what 90% of cars are used for.
Old 08-15-2004, 04:32 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
FCGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=rai,Aug 15 2004, 04:05 PM]BTW 90% of cars are not taken to the track, so "track times" are mostly academic.
Old 08-15-2004, 06:40 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
yellafeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 3,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course I'd pick an S2000 over the base Boxster. It is much more fun to drive; I've driven a base Boxster quite a few times, and it's not on the same par as an S2K.

NOW, if we're talking bout a Boxster S, I may pick it over an S2K. There are HUGE differences between the base and Boxster S, not just the bigger engine and hp, but improved suspension and almost everything else.

But for now, I'd pick the S2K over the base Boxster. Before I purchased the S2K, the base Boxster was on the list also, but after extensive test-drives, it didn't do it for me. The Z3 was also on my list. But needless to say, it didn't come close to being picked.
Old 08-16-2004, 08:54 AM
  #56  
Registered User

 
speed_bump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: MoCo
Posts: 24,687
Received 195 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Uncle Fester,Aug 15 2004, 06:12 AM]As far as price goes, I think I can safely say that we all live in the real world where money does matter.
Old 08-16-2004, 10:10 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
Axel6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Fester,Aug 15 2004, 02:12 AM
I would wager that if taken around a track, that the Boxster and S2000 would post very similar lap times.
Given equal drivers on the same track and conditions??? Absolutely, no way. Sorry. All the comparisons prove otherwise.
Old 08-16-2004, 11:52 AM
  #58  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Axel6,Aug 13 2004, 06:37 AM
I don't know if you've ever auto-x against one or not, but I can tell you that the BASE Boxster is not even close in terms of performance.
Originally Posted by Officer_down,Aug 15 2004, 03:44 AM
There is no mistake that the base Boxster WILL get spanked on any course or autocross.
Those mouthing off about driving the Boxster in autocross would be best advised to take their own advice before posting.

Consensus in the autocross community is that the S2000 is slightly faster than the Boxster, but it's by no means a night-and-day difference, and it took us several years to figure this out conclusively. What the Boxster lacks in top-end power it gains back in handling -- you can pull stunts in a Boxster that would be inadvisable in an S2000 because it's so much friendlier at the limit. As a result, it's easy to jump into a Boxster and go fast, but that's not the case for an S2000; I'd speculate that a lot of people would go faster in a Boxster than an S2000 for that reason.

A Boxster won B Stock at this year's Houston National Tour, and Boxsters took a quarter of the BS trophies at last year's Nationals. There's a proposal on the table to move the Boxster up to AS along with the S2000. Not bad for a car that's "not even close".

I'll grant that, on an open track, the S2000's power advantage would spell doom for the Boxster.

Steve
Old 08-16-2004, 12:56 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
Axel6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=PedalFaster,Aug 16 2004, 11:52 AM]
Those mouthing off about driving the Boxster in autocross would be best advised to take their own advice before posting.
Old 08-16-2004, 01:30 PM
  #60  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Whoops -- accidental double post.


Quick Reply: Boxster vs S2000 straight up



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:33 PM.