Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.
View Poll Results: If you had the choice for $32K ?
Boxster
28.42%
S2000
71.58%
Voters: 190. You may not vote on this poll

Boxster vs S2000 straight up

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-12-2004, 05:44 AM
  #1  
rai
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: mount airy
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Boxster vs S2000 straight up

I just entered a sweepstake for a Boxster or a 6-cylinder Cayenne. I hope if I win I can take the cash value on another Porsche (like a 911). But if not, I'd probably take the Boxster.

So I went to see the actual price of a Boxster (I've never looked at anything except the Boxster S).

Boxster $42,600
Boxster S $51,600


That's around $10/20K more than S2000.


Let's take away the $10K price difference. I'm talking only about the Boxster (NOT the Boxster S).

Would you take one straight up (same price) over the S2000?

2.7L flat-6 with 225 HP and 192-TQ I believe in addition to the extra TQ it's what they call useable TQ because it's at 4800 rpm.

It only has a 5-speed MT

It weighs 2811 (around the same as the S2000)


For me, I like the S2000 better, but I see them more or less as equal cars. But the Porsche has more prestige and thus cost's more.
Old 08-12-2004, 05:49 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Axel6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The s2000 totally blows away a BASE Boxster in just about every performance category. I say S2K, hands down. Now a Boxster S is a much worthier competitor. That WOULD BE a tough choice. Hmmm.
Old 08-12-2004, 06:10 AM
  #3  
Registered User

 
SocratesDTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Athens/Attiki
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



S2k is faster than the Boxter, so I will choose the S2k (also IMHO the S2k is more beautyful.)
Old 08-12-2004, 06:14 AM
  #4  
Registered User

 
steven975's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

while the boxter's torque peaks at 4800, the S's peaks at 7500. Now, the S has plenty of torque from 3000 on...it's still "usable."

Straight up, it would be the S. While mid-engine, boxters are hard to work on and I see them everywhere.
Old 08-12-2004, 06:30 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
GodoftheBOLP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Romulus, MI
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a boxter, imho the S a.) performs better b.) looks better c.) more rare... I see far more boxsters than S2000's
Old 08-12-2004, 06:43 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
mvf4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: north
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

boxsters are girly.
Old 08-12-2004, 06:54 AM
  #7  
rai
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: mount airy
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mvf4s,Aug 12 2004, 06:43 AM
boxsters are girly.
You guys are harsh. Boxsters are expensive, but IMO they are superior to many cars.

Let's imagine if the S2000 didn't exist.

You'd have:

MR-2 spyder (due to be discontinued)
Z4
Miata
350Z vert
Vette
Boxster
SLK
Crossfire


On that lsit, the Boxster looks pretty good.


I see just as many S2000s as Boxsters.
Old 08-12-2004, 07:08 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
SilverRedBlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I vote for the boxster. Hmm...that's no brainer. I'll take the Boxter, resell it and buy a new S2k. I got the better car and $10K to spend.
Old 08-12-2004, 07:28 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Axel6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rai,Aug 12 2004, 06:54 AM
You guys are harsh. Boxsters are expensive, but IMO they are superior to many cars.

Let's imagine if the S2000 didn't exist.

You'd have:

MR-2 spyder (due to be discontinued)
Z4
Miata
350Z vert
Vette
Boxster
SLK
Crossfire


On that lsit, the Boxster looks pretty good.


I see just as many S2000s as Boxsters.
RAI, there are a LOT of "if's" in your posts!

IF price were no object and IF the StooK did not exist, THEN the Boxster would be a good choice.

IF that were the case, that is.
Old 08-12-2004, 07:29 AM
  #10  

 
wing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 7,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

He said IGNORE the price difference....

So I did..... when I was looking at used, I could have had a used boxster (a few years older than a used S) but for the same price.

I've always wanted a porsche but the S just appealed to me MUCH MUCH more. Maintenance on the Boxster scared me, I wouldn't be able to work on it myself.

The S IMO is MUCH better looking, the boxster is odd shaped.


Quick Reply: Boxster vs S2000 straight up



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 AM.